1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iren [92.7K]
3 years ago
11

Why is it important to consider both primary and secondary sources when examining history?

History
1 answer:
Genrish500 [490]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Most research uses both primary and secondary sources. They complement each other to help you build a convincing argument. Primary sources are more credible as evidence, but secondary sources show how your work relates to existing research.

You might be interested in
A country would most likely adopt a market economy if it wanted to
igor_vitrenko [27]

Answer:

Make sure prices of goods and services are set by supply and demand .

Explanation:

The economies of the United States and other countries, such as Japan, are based on capitalism. ... Decisions regarding investment and the use of the means of production are determined by competing business owners in the marketplace. Production takes place within the process of capital accumulation.

Countries that have a market economy are Mexico, United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Canada . These countries have a market economy because the prices of goods and services are set by supply and demand .

3 0
3 years ago
Read the excerpt from Theodore Roosevelt’s 1910 "New Nationalism” speech.
pshichka [43]

C- He hoped that congress would strengthen the laws against monopolies.

D- He was upset that laws preventing the formation of monopolies had failed.

E- He believed the government should control businesses operating across state lines.

are the three of Roosevelt’s perspectives on monopolies

In a speech given on August 31, 1910, in Osawatomie, Kansas, Roosevelt advocated what he called "the new nationalism." The central issue he argued was the state's protection of human welfare and property rights, but he also argued that human welfare is more important than property rights.

He argued that only a strong federal government can regulate the economy and guarantee justice and that a president can only achieve economic goals if he makes protecting human well-being his top priority. did. Roosevelt believed that industrial concentration was a natural part of the economy.

He wanted an administrative body (rather than the courts) to run his business. The federal government should be put in place to protect working men, women, and children from exploitation. Politically, Roosevelt's platform included a wide range of social and political reforms advocated by progressives.

Learn more about Roosevelt's new nationalism speech here: brainly.com/question/19958250

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
Who was the property of the land during the Middle Ages?
BigorU [14]

D the serf cause yes

                                 

7 0
3 years ago
Henry IV made important changes to nobility that augmented the king’s power. What were these changes?
bija089 [108]

French nobility was a powerful political class who always used to dictate the terms of court of king. They were hereditary and had collected a lot of wealth. They used to live in fortified castles and enjoyed a luxuries life. They had limited the powers of the king and became as king makers.

King Henry IV introduced some important measures which curbed the influence of these hereditary nobles and laid the foundation of absolutism in France. He inducted the commoners into to the nobility and thus curbed the influence of hereditary nobles. He also waged the wars against the ambitious nobles. He used Intendants to bring the royal authority to provinces and nobles. For tax collection royal bureaucrats were employed by him which further decreased the influence of hereditary nobles and increased the centralization of power as well.

7 0
3 years ago
Explain three events that effected American relations with Mexico in the early 1900s
neonofarm [45]

The dispute surrounding assigning the border at the Río Grande or at Nueces River, coupled with the U.S. annexation of Texas in 1845, set the Mexican-American War into motion. This slice of land between the Río Grande and the Nueces River is called the Trans-Nueces, which you can see in the middle of the two yellow lines in the center of the map on the left. Lasting from 1846-1848, the Mexican-American War ended in the Mexico-U.S. border being set at the Rio Grande and the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. As part of the Treaty, Mexico lost a devastating 55% of its land to the U.S., giving both countries the border we recognize today. Well, for the most part.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the structure of our state government
    12·2 answers
  • Describe the Spain's treatment of the native Americans?
    5·1 answer
  • What conclusion can you draw about the people who participated in trade networks? a. They benefited from the trade networks. b.
    5·1 answer
  • What did President Lincoln risk if he chose not to resupply Fort Sumter?
    12·1 answer
  • How did this archaeological site get the name Poverty Point
    8·1 answer
  • Look at this photograph of Richmond, Virginia after its capture. How does this represent an important event during the Civil War
    6·2 answers
  • Richest heretic was known as ​
    8·1 answer
  • Why are landmarks so important to our history?
    9·1 answer
  • Do you think the limits on the Japanese military helped the Japanese economy after World War II? Give two examples to support yo
    5·1 answer
  • Cno tagalog dto?<br>sumagot kayo​
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!