Answer:
Explanation:Roediger and Karpicke (2006) investigated whether the test-enhanced learning effect (the demonstration that repeated testing improves memory for material) was due merely to repeated exposure to material. They randomly assigned participants to one of two study conditions (study-study or study-test) and to one of three retention interval conditions (final test at a delay of 5 minutes, 2 days, or 1 week). The dependent variable was the proportion of idea units recalled from an encyclopedia passage. How would you label the analysis for these data?A. 2 × 2 within-groups ANOVAB. 2 × 3 within-groups ANOVAC. 2 × 3 between-groups ANOVAD. 4 × 2 between-groups ANOVA
Answer:
Explanation:
Answer:
c. Observational studies have both independent and dependent variables.
d. Observational studies can be used to test hypothesis.
Explanation:
Observational studies are ones in which a researcher makes observations about his thoughts and views. He observes the risk and other effects before actual test takes place. This is usually the initial phase of research where observations are made for suitability of certain things that are to be researched. There is initial feasibility test conducted to identify whether the further research process is beneficial or not.
Indian nationalism developed as a concept during the Indian independence movement which campaigned for independence from British rule. ... It continues to strongly influence the politics of India and reflects an opposition to the sectarian strands of Hindu nationalism and Muslim nationalism.
Answer:
10
Explanation:
In 2003, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed that in determining any risk, regulators should assume children have 10 times the exposure risk of adults to cancer-causing chemicals. Some health scientists contends that these guidelines are too weak. They suggest that, to be on safe side, we should assume that the risk of harm from toxins is 100 times that of adults. Others support doing this on ethical grounds, they say it is wrong not to give children much greater protection from harmful chemicals in the environment.