So I don't believe that it is common, though I do believe that many can be commonly misinformed. It's not the event that is to be mistaken, instead it is more common to find a misdated event. Does that make sense? So the title or name of the event is not mistaken for another, but instead I believe the date or the event itself can be misinterpreted. Since, in order to know exactly what happened, you need to be there, and at the same time, there are many different perspectives. If you need further explanation, just let me know.
Answer:
Well, in play A Daring and Dastardly Deeds, Hannah is happy and excited by the thought of being a detective, as shown when she skips around and eagerly tries to do what she reads about Sherlock Holmes doing by "observing others and deducing" something about them by watching closely in attempts to notice something that everyone else is oblivious to.
In play B The Mystery of the Shiny Paper, Hannah seems upset at her previous hopes of being a detective because every time she tries to be observant, she can't find anything interesting or out of the ordinary that she would consider something deduced in a detective-like manner, leaving her feeling discouraged and unhappy, both of which were directly stated in text as the narrator gave Hannah direct characterization repeatedly.
(I apologize if this is wrong or too long or something, this was just my attempt at being logical '^^)
Explanation:
If u mean a language that is ''dead'' and its no longer spoken as a native language but still studied, than yes we can still use words from it, so the answer is true.
Answer:
D.) character versus nature is the answer.
