Answer:
I believe that the best answer here lies somewhere in the middle. I believe that interest groups can be beneficial for society, and democracy in general, when they seek to ensure that a government really works towards the good of all people through their lobbying actions, but they can also be a bad thing when their purposes are only to benefit the group and not society at large. For example, when you take such interest groups as workers movements, you see this middle ground. Their protests, and lobbying in Congress, have ensured that policies in favor of laborers have been passed, improved, and maintained. In this instance, interest groups have exerted a positive influence on democracy. But, when they simply start to pressure for measures that can only benefit their particular group, to the detriment of other members of society, then, they are not so good.
There is also the issue that interest groups, especially when they become pretty powerful and influential, can begin to exert too much pressure and interfere with policies that have been good for the general public, but that do not benefit their particular interests. So in this case, interest groups are not too good for democracy. However, on the other side of that same coin, interest groups that seek to pressure for the benefit of the general population, to have policies in favor of such things as healthcare, social programs, etc., can be very beneficial to democracy.
Finally, interest groups are a way in which the people in a country can have influence on their government, aside from representatives that are elected. These groups, if they have elected officials, can exert pressure so that the people´s interests, and desires, are met. It is a way to keep government balanced and within the scope of: rule for the people and by the people.
Answer:
The correct answer is d.
Explanation:
In sociology, a subculture refers to a group of people within a larger culture that hold different ideas, values and ways of life than those of the mainstream, while still tied to their original culture. A counterculture is a <u>type of subculture that holds different values and ideas that are directly and actively in opposition to important aspects of the mainstream</u>. So while all countercultures are subcultures, not all subcultures are countercultures.
Some famous examples of countercultures were the hippie movement of the 1960s and the punks in the 1970s-1980s. They both explicitly rejected many aspects of the mainstream of the time and sought a lifestyle that directly opposed it.
Receivers with high involvement and high need for cognition. The elaboration likelihood model (ELM) of influence is a double procedure hypothesis portraying the change of states of mind from. The ELM was produced by Richard E. Frivolous and John Cacioppo in 1986. The model expects to clarify diverse methods for preparing boosts, why they are utilized, and their results on state of mind change.
The answer would be a. the smaller states
hope that helps, God bless!
Question options:
a. internal; external
b. external; internal
c. external; internal
d. internal; internal
Answer:
internal; external
Explanation:
The expectancy theory was developed by J.B. Rotter to explain why people behave the way they do. The theory suggests people take certain actions(behaviour) based on the outcome and value of that behaviour which has been informed by past experiences and learning.
Rotter classified people into two types: internals and externals. Internals according to Rotter are individuals who believe that happenings are a result of their own direct efforts. Externals, on the other hand believe things happen by such things as luck and cannot be controlled by them.
