1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anni [7]
2 years ago
15

Which of the following best describes a long term effect of industrialization

History
1 answer:
Jobisdone [24]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

LONG TERM EFFECT: Workers won higher wages, shorter hours, & better conditions. Workers stilled overworked and underpaid. Overseers & skilled workers=lower middle class. Factory owners & merchants=upper middle class.

You might be interested in
HELP FAST WILL MARK BRAINLY IF ITS A GOOD AWNSER
alexandr1967 [171]

The Gupta Empire was an ancient Indian empire existing from the mid-to-late 3rd century CE to 543 CE. At its zenith, from approximately 319 to 467 CE, it covered much of the Indian subcontinent.

6 0
3 years ago
John Locke believed that al people had natural rights which included
Ivahew [28]

Answer:

D. All of the Above

Explanation:

John Locke believed that all people had natural rights, which included:

Life, Liberty, and Property.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
To what extent were the lives of enslaved africans different from the lives of european indentured servants in the seventeenth-c
ExtremeBDS [4]

The extent that were lives of enslaved Africans different from the lives of European indentured servants in the seventeenth-century north American colonies are -

Depending on the time and region in history, several factors have influenced African Americans' legal status in North America. African laborers' civil status was not defined by regulations in the early years of colonization. Black employees appear to have had a social position akin to that of white indentured slaves from Europe, who were contractually bound to labor for their owners for certain periods of time.

Black men and women, particularly in New Amsterdam, started to enjoy certain permissions that would later be denied to enslaved blacks in America, despite the fact that their station was that of inferiority that made them amenable to mistreatment by masters. Black servants could, for instance, sue their employers in court like white servants might. Some, such as Pedro Negretto and Manuel Rues, who filed lawsuits for unpaid wages, even succeeded.

To know more about servants here

brainly.com/question/10854124

#SPJ4

8 0
2 years ago
Why does Hitler want to control poland?​
liraira [26]

Answer: i found this on the internet. Hope it helps :)

Eight Reasons Hitler Invaded Poland

1.   To give Germans lebensraum in Eastern Europe

He had promised this in Mein Kampf (1924) and it was one of the three CENTRAL AIMS of Hitler foreign policy.

2.   Because he thought Chamberlain would not dare stop him

Chamberlain had stood up to Hitler, remember, at Bad Godesberg during the Sudeten crisis, but had then backed down at Munich.   Hitler despised Chamberlain, and did not believe that he would dare to go to war.   So he felt able to pursue his aims in Poland despite Chamberlain's promise in March 1939 to support Poland.

3.   To defend the Germans in Poland

The reason Hitler gave was that the Poles were persecuting those Germans who lived in Poland.   (There was some truth in this.)

4.   To overturn the Treaty of Versailles

This was a second CENTRAL AIM of Hitler's foreign policy.   The Polish Corridor and Posen had been given to Poland in 1919, and Danzig had been declared a free city administered by the League of Nations.   Hitler first asked Poland to consider the position of Danzig in October 1938, immediately after Munich, and in March 1939, Hitler demanded that he be given Danzig (this was the pattern he had followed with Austria and the Sudetenland).   Did you know that in March 1939 also, Germany seized the Lithuanian port of Memel (at the northern end of East Prussia)?   When Hitler demanded Danzig in March 1939, Brauchitsch, the Commander in Chief of the German Army noted that he intended ultimately to 'knock Poland down completely', and that eventually Hitler wanted Germany's pre-WWI boundary restoring.

5.   To oppose Communism/conquer Russia

I know Poland wasn't communist, but Russia was where Hitler was eventually headed (Mein Kampf, 1924) and Poland was just another step east.   When he demanded Danzig in 1939, Hitler's proposal included a joint anti-Soviet alliance against Russia.   This was the third CENTRAL AIM of Hitler foreign policy.

6.   To teach Chamberlain a lesson

Chamberlain's guarantee of Poland on 31 March 1939 infuriated Hitler - 'I'll cook them a stew they'll choke on' - was his reaction.   From then on he was determined to destroy Poland.  So you could say he wanted to attack Poland to teach Chamberlain a lesson.

7.   To prevent an anti-German alliance

Having thought about it, he realised also that the world was beginning to gang up on him, so the next day, 1 April, his CONSIDERED reaction was this: 'if they expect Germany to sit patiently by while they create satellite States and set them against Germany, then they are mistaken'.   This is fair enough, actually, because that is exactly what Chamberlain was trying to do.   And Poland was preparing to resist Hitler, and had started mobilising its army - Hitler stated that this broke Poland's non-aggression pact with Germany [see note below].   On April 3 Hitler issued a directive to his armies - entitled 'Case White' - stating that he wished to 'destroy Polish military strength and create in the East a situation which satisfies the requirements of national defence'.   In this document, he set the date for 'Case White' - 'any time from 1 September 1939 onward.' - and told the Werhmacht to draw up a timetable.

8.   The Nazi-Soviet Pact

After April 1939, both Roosevelt and Stalin began to express concerns about Hitler's aims on Poland.   Hitler merely mocked Roosevelt, but he was worried about Stalin.   Only Stalin - and the Russian army - could have stopped Hitler taking over Poland at this point.   But the failure of the Anglo-Soviet negotiations and the Nazi-Soviet Pact of 23 August 1939 not only freed up Hitler to attack Poland, it included a secret agreement to divide Poland up between them.   In the end, Hitler invaded Poland because he had agreed to do so with Stalin.

Explanation:

HOPE THIS HELPS! :D

4 0
3 years ago
How was ancient Mesopotamia society similar to modern society​
lidiya [134]

Answer: They are different because back then they had no gender equality,and now that is very different

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What would make the United States and Canada be considered a single region?​
    5·1 answer
  • Before the Dust Bowl, prairie grass held soil down during high winds and
    12·2 answers
  • Who is smarter light or Shikamaru <br> (Naruto and death note )
    7·2 answers
  • How true is the statement that Britain's polices hastened the decline of the British Caribbean sugar industry
    10·2 answers
  • What is a monopoly?
    9·1 answer
  • Modernize Odysseus speech<br> Summerize the speech
    13·1 answer
  • What role did South Carolina’s political leaders play in the Nullification Crisis?
    7·1 answer
  • “ The world in which we live in does not exist in some absolute sense but is just one model of reality. The consequence of one p
    14·1 answer
  • How did agricultural innovations contribute to the start of the Industrial Revolution?
    8·1 answer
  • Reflect on the texts and the details that you read about the lives of some of the Founders.
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!