Answer:
innocent 3 defended these extreme measures because The Spanish Inquisition, which began in the late fifteenth century, targeted Jews and Muslims in Europe, he saw the catholic reformists as a threat to the beliefs of the Catholic Church and social stability.
Explanation:
hope this makes since
Answer: Early on, the Native Americans cordially welcomed the Europeans in general. However, the greed of whites for gold, silver and exotic goods would soon change this peaceful relationship, promoting violent ethnic of the native populations. In addition to the physical destruction itself, the Native Americans had their culture, their uses and their customs destroyed by the Europeans, who, in the name of "civilization" and "religion," imposed on them new languages and a new faith.
It is not easy see something good about this.
The pope strengthened his power over the monarchs of Europe.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
With the end of the Crusades, the Europeans were defeated and there was in power of the Europeans and the defeat and end of the crusades led to the increase in the power of the pope of the Christianity religion.
After Crusades ended, there was increase in the impact of Christianity and the western civilization. With the increase in this impact, the power, wealth of the pope increased and leading to the increase in the power of the roman catholic church also.
The correct answer is: ""That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness." According to the principle of Social Contract developed by 18th century Philosophers (notably Jean-Jacques Rousseau) a government is only legitimate if it respects the authority that people have consented to give it in order to protect their inalienable human rights and that it loses such legitimacy when it does the opposite, the people (the governed) have the right to modify it or overthrow it.
