1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OverLord2011 [107]
3 years ago
7

What is the risk of selling drugs?​

English
1 answer:
Genrish500 [490]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Selling drugs is illegal in many parts of the world making it highly risky

You might be interested in
Which examples demonstrate common Banking and Related Services workplaces and employers? Check all that
NeTakaya

Answer:

1,3,5

or

A,C,E

Explanation:

;)

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
7. Some of the ------------baseball teams played yesterday.
rjkz [21]

Answer:

Boys' .

Explanation:

These are common examples and how to apply these rules.

The boy's video game console. (It belongs to a single boy.)

The Cathedral boys' will be playing. (Whereas boys' refers to a group of boys.)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
nydimaria [60]
I believe it has to be B,C, and E. The rising action comes before the climax, so that eliminates D and A.
6 0
3 years ago
Quindlen begins by disagreeing with a fellow writer. How and how fairly does she represent the opposing point of view?
Oksi-84 [34.3K]

Answer:Quindlen was criticizing the application of standardized testing (perhaps in the wake of the controversial "No Child Left Behind" act which some say placed too much emphasis on standardized testing). Quindlen's argument is that if standardized testing is to be used, it should at least be interesting and more importantly, such testing should not edit works of literature to the point at which significant meaning is lost. Actually, she is arguing that literature should not be edited at all.  

Quindlen doesn't think children are too feeble and weak to read controversial issues because they are exposed to such issues through the media and Internet every day. In fact, by sanitizing (editing out anything remotely controversial) literature, the test will not challenge the student.  

Those who design the test claim that anything controversial might distract the student and affect his/her performance. Quindlen's response is that the kids can handle it and more to the point, if all remotely controversial issues are edited out, what is left can hardly been interesting or engaging. Also, to edit in this way is historically irresponsible. Quindlen notes that in Isaac Singer's excerpt about being a young Jew in prewar (World War II) Poland, all references to Jews and Poles were taken out.  

Quindlen notes that there are other consequences of this editing. One is that the students will determine from this that those designing the test have no faith in their (the students') ability to handle differing perspectives and challenging intellectual material. Quindlen argues that this is sending the message to children that "we don't think you're smart enough."  

But what do the kids learn from this? That the written word doesn't really matter much, that it can be weakened at will. That no one trusts a student to understand that variations in opinion and background are both objectively interesting and intellectually challenging.  

This also tells the student that there is no power to the written word (as literature, laws, etc.) if we can simply edit things that don't appeal to a particular way of thinking. So, clearly Quindlen is against this manipulation of literature, in these tests and in general, for a number of reasons, all logical. This kind of editing also sets a dangerous precedent where those in power of educating children have the ability to subject students to a particular worldview that they only assume is the best for everyone. This is quite audacious and ignores one of the hallmarks of American culture: diversity.

Explanation:

hope you get your thing correct

4 0
3 years ago
Which type of figurative language is used in the following line from Martin Luther King Jr.'s letter?
finlep [7]

Answer: Metaphor .

Explanation:

This is a line from Martin Luther King Jr.'s open letter, known as <em>The Letter from Birmingham Jail</em>, in which he supports nonviolent resistance to racial discrimination.

King describes all the hardships that people face, and explains that for people who have never experienced them, it is easy to say that those who did need to wait patiently for their rights. One of these hardships is segregation, and King uses a metaphor in this line to emphasize it.

<em>A metaphor</em> is a figure of speech in which two objects/concepts that do not have much in common are compared, in order to explain an idea. There is no such thing as <em>"stinging darts of segregation"</em>, but King uses sharp darts to demonstrate the effect that racial discrimination has on people who experience it.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I was surprised to find corruption grown so high and so quick in that empire, by the force of luxury so lately introduced; which
    11·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from The Call of the Wild.
    13·2 answers
  • How much does a potato weigh
    7·2 answers
  • Air masses former of strong wind<br>True<br>False​
    8·1 answer
  • J Underline the collective nouns in the following sentences:
    5·1 answer
  • By Jack London
    10·1 answer
  • How does paragraph 3 contribute to the organizational pattern of the passage?
    12·1 answer
  • All of the following are elements of fiction EXCEPT:
    6·1 answer
  • WHAT ARE THESE ANSWERS PLEASE ANSWER!!!!! ASAP please help
    5·1 answer
  • Looked-forward to or expected.​
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!