1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frutty [35]
3 years ago
8

how did the restoration of voting rights to white Southerners undermine efforts to perserve and protect the voting rights of the

freedmen?
History
1 answer:
san4es73 [151]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:   1. white democrats would rally behind old confederate beliefs.

2. freedmen had no protection with out support of republicans.

3. freedmen rights would be undermined by the white voters.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Select all the correct answers.
artcher [175]
Ocopass and ocoln system
7 0
2 years ago
Read the excerpt from "American Indian Civil Rights.” Over the years, American Indian activists have valiantly fought for reform
Rus_ich [418]
I don't understand what the question is!
3 0
2 years ago
How would you describe the relationship between the United States and Japan around the time of World War 2?
sergejj [24]

Answer:

They were enemies.

Explanation:

Americans strongly opposed Japan's invasion of China in 1937. President Roosevelt imposed increasingly stringent economic sanctions intended to deprive Japan of the oil and steel, as well as dollars, it needed to continue its war in China. Japan reacted by forging an alliance with Germany and Italy in 1940, known as the Tripartite Pact, which worsened its relations with the US. In July 1941, the United States, Great Britain, and the Netherlands froze all Japanese assets and cut off oil shipments—Japan had little oil of its own.

8 0
3 years ago
Was the US Supreme Court’s decision fair and benevolent to Dred Scott and his family? Why?
schepotkina [342]

Answer:

The US Supreme Court’s decision fair and benevolent to Dred Scott and his family is described below in complete detail.

Explanation:

The Dred Scott judgment was the U.S. Supreme Court's judgment on March 6, 1857, that has existed in a free state and region did not authorize a slave character, Dred Scott, to his independence.

They dictated that African Americans, whether they were slaves or had parents who were slaves, had no constitutional avenue in court. They believed that the Missouri Compromise was illegal. In the cores of the court, Dred Scott had no constitutional right to demand his freedom.

8 0
2 years ago
How has Charles Darwin contributed to the study of evolution?
Masteriza [31]
The answer is A, natural selection.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • According to the quote, what happened between 1880 and 1890? The increase in settlements in the West caused the frontier line to
    12·2 answers
  • Information presented to the public that is misleading (most often intentionally), and that is used to build or destroy support
    7·2 answers
  • The Kansas-Nebraska Act nullified the Missouri Compromise by
    15·2 answers
  • What was General MacArthur’s main motivation as he led forces in the Southwest Pacific between 1942 and 1944? his sworn commitme
    8·2 answers
  • Nat Turner is MOST known in American history for A) leading an unsuccessful slave revolt in Virginia in the 1830s. B) leading th
    10·2 answers
  • Difference between the House and the Senate 5-7 sentences
    6·1 answer
  • How and why did nationalism develop into imperialism?
    7·1 answer
  • Select the correct text in the passage.
    10·2 answers
  • How did mining lead to the rise of boomtowns
    10·1 answer
  • What are the four main points in the decline of Rome. Give an example for each point
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!