Answer:
A
Explanation:
When news of the Glorious Revolution reach Massachusetts, the Boston Revolt started as people gathered to overthrow the governor of the Dominion of New England.
Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
Answer:
I think just the right amount.
Explanation:
The reason for me thinking this is that you may think the president has no boss but in fact, us as the people are their boss. They do tend to make really bad decisions often but somehow were all still here so it must have worked out in the end...
He hauled Soviets out of Afghanistan and marked new arms control bargains. He called for glasnost or openness, and perestroika, rebuilding of the legislature and economy. Gorbachev additionally pushed the Soviet Union toward constrained private undertaking.
Your answer is A.) Lincoln won 40% of the popular vote. Lincoln actually won the election with less than 40% of the popular vote.
