How does the Giver propose “changing things” in the community?
Answer: What the Giver is planning to share all the memories he has with the community. He believes that memories are meant to be shared otherwise it is lonely. He also hopes that through through the shared memories, the citizens will acquire some wisdom.
I hope it helps, Regards.
Based on the Number Of Parts Used.
A manufacturing firm produces multiple families of products requiring various combinations of different types of parts. The manufacturer has identified various cost pools, one of which consists of materials handling costs. This cost pool includes the wages and employee benefits of the workers involved in receiving materials, inspecting materials, storing materials in inventory, and moving materials to the workstations; depreciation and maintenance of materials handling equipment (e.g., forklift trucks); and costs of supplies used as well as other related costs. Of the following, the most appropriate cost driver for assigning materials handling costs to the various products most likely is the Number of Parts Used.
Learn more about Manufacturing firms here:
brainly.com/question/15722608
#SPJ4
The correct answer is "<span>the medicalization of human problems".
Valium can be used as an anti-depressant and as a tranquilizer. It is a medication that can be only brought with a prescription from one's physician. Valium calms the nerves of a depress or upset individual. In this situation, mary was given valium so she can cope up with the lose of her husband.</span>
Answer:
Horace Mann was an American politician and education reformer, best known for promoting universal public education and teacher training in "normal schools."
Explanation:
Researching with human participants (independently of their particularities, such as those mentioned) is regulated by the U.S. Federal regulations named “Common Rule Layout,” federally funded research using humans also need review by an IRB of the institution conducting the research.
They establish in chapter III “Standards and guidance for members of the research ethics committees, incise 3: “Selection of study population and recruitment of research participants Ethically acceptable research ensures that no group or class of persons bears more than its fair share of the burdens of participation in research. Similarly, no group should be deprived of its fair share of the benefits of research; these benefits include the direct benefits of participation (if any) as well as the new knowledge that the research is designed to yield. Thus, one question for research ethics review to consider is whether the population that will bear the risks of participating in the research is likely to benefit from the knowledge derived from the research. Also, ethically acceptable research includes recruitment strategies that are balanced and objectively describe the purpose of the research, the risks and potential benefits of participating in the research, and other relevant details” (p.13)
The document: “Preg45CFR 46, Subpart B: Additional Protections for Pregnant Women, Human Fetuses and Neonates Involved in Research”, indeed specifies in detail those requirements also necessary to research with these groups. If determined research reviewed by the IRB as previously mentioned (even when women, minors, persons kept in detention and unborn fetuses are all considered vulnerable research participants) meet the requirements for the research, as specified elsewhere.
Therefore, the correct answer is A) the research can be authorized if the requirements for subpart b, additional protections for pregnant women, human fetuses and neonates involved in research are met because subpart b takes precedence over subpart d. The requirements of subparts a, b, c, and d are met.
