When they encounter the people that seek material gains, the Indians mostly respond in hostile way because they felt that they're being exploited.
When it come to religious teachings, it become really complicated.
Some indians could be really open minded about the new religion and willing to integrate their ancient religion with the new teachings in order to create a better harmony.
Some of them on the other hand, could felt insulted and undermined if the new teachings somehow do not match with their ancient religion, which could lead to confrontation.
Answer:
Eric Hobsbawm, the Marxist British historian, wrote a book called The Short Twentieth Century. The 20th Century had been shorter than other centuries because it had begun in 1914 with the outbreak of the First World War and terminated of course early in November 1989 with the fall of the Berlin Wall. The problem however, and of course we historians we like problems, is that everybody knew what we had left behind with the fall of the wall, but nobody knew what we were heading towards. As Douglas Hurd, the British Foreign Secretary at the time, put it, “this was a system [the Cold War], this was a system under which we had lived quite happily for 40 years.” Or as Adam Michnik, again my Polish solidarity intellectual, put it “The worst thing about communism is what comes afterwards.” While our populations were in jubilation in front of the television screens or on the streets of Berlin, governments were, it has to be said, seriously worried about the implications of this unforeseen, uncontrolled and uncontrollable collapse of the Warsaw Pact and the communist system. Tom Wolf, the American author, at the time had a bestseller called the Bonfire of the Vanities and a British MP that I knew at the time famously rephrased that as the ‘bonfire of the certainties.’ All of the reference points with which we’d lived for half a century and which had organized our diplomacy, our military strategy, our ideology, were like as many props that were suddenly pulled from us.
The first one champ have a good day
<span>No, this does mean that the aversion trait evolves in the cockroach populations exposed to the bait. Cockroaches are a diverse species. This diversity is one of the reasons they thrive. Not all cockroaches will be strongly attracted to hydramethylnon-corn syrup. However, the ones that are all died and can not procreate. The cockroaches that are not very attracted to the syrup live on to breed, and pass along the aversion trait. So the trait does not necessarily evolve, but it does become more prevalent.</span>