In this case, one has to check on some of the issues which had been addressed first by Hoover and later relate them and see how they could be addressed by Coolidge and Harding and the techniques used by Harding also realized hence the way to address this case . For instance, Hoover had tackled issues based on economic and social development, therefore, these are similar issues to be related to the resolving powers of Harding and Coolidge. For instance, Coolidge and Harding talked much and had a lot of approaches to solving issues, for instance they used policy approach techniques to solve such issues, for instance the economic policy that led to economic growth, growth in the constitutional government among other things, hence the way to go about this case. Explanation: In this regard, the achievements of Coolidge and Harding have been realized and therefore there is need address the issue which Hoover dealt with and refer them to how Coolidge and Harding could have dealt with them, hence the reason as to why using the policy approach to solving issues has been proposed in this case.
<u>Answer:</u>
No, the government under the Constitution does not have that ability now.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- The early governments that were not bound by established rules could implement new decisions through their own conscience every other day.
- Such governments had given themselves the ability to conduct governance the way they thought was right for society.
- In other words, they had the ability to govern the governed without the consent of governed.
- This undue ability of the governments got limitations as the Constitution came into being.
We learn from our mistakes and that way we know what not to do. We continue to make mistakes and in the future we will look back on them and know not to do that again
He was eligible to pick and appoint who he wanted and in return they helped him out in the long run and helped him set good precedence.
Well they tell the story about some social and cultural<span> issues of the ... </span>These<span> people wanted the good life that they believed money could buy. In some </span>ways<span>, the 1980s were the opposite of the 1960s. ... The period of </span>change<span> came during the 1970s. ... Higher education was a way to get the skills to </span>do<span> this.</span>
