Insufferable is the Gothic tone it is repeated and is explained to as the narraters feelings
<span>satire: the combination of humor and criticism to point out human follies
</span> <span>It's so effective because it takes whatever it is criticizing to a point that you have to laugh and proves the truth of the criticism. Effective satire has to be based on "truth" - the characteristics satirized have to be there, exaggerated but there.
Example: "You might be from Wisconsin if you consider it a sport to gather your food by drilling through 38 inches of ice and sitting there all day hoping that the food will swim by."</span>
Answer:
1. The room wasn't cleaned by him yesterday.
2. A letter shall be sent to my friend by me next Monday.
3.This book was written by whom?
4. The text was being discussed by us when he entered.
5. The topic of the discussion has already been chosen by them.
6. When was this information received?
7. His pet must be fed everyday.
8. My grandfather's house was built by him two years ago.
Explanation:
I think it would be 40 ounces, i’m not sure though sorry if it’s wrong :)
Answer:
Based on word choice, Giblin feels:
B. that it was worthwhile.
Explanation:
We can easily eliminate options A and C, since there is nothing conveying a negative connotation in the excerpt. We are left with options B and D.
Let's take a look at option D first. It says Giblin thinks the process of obtaining copies of the stone was amazing. However, that is not what the word choice conveys. Had there been words such as "fantastic" or "incredible" in the excerpt, this option would have made sense. But that is not the case.
<u>Option B is the only correct one. The excerpt uses words such as "fortunately", "good", and "clear". Those words convey the idea that the process the French used was worthwhile. It not only worked, but worked well, effectively.</u>