Answer: D) Tax Court
Explanation:
Tax court of United States is court that is made for hearing tax-related issue and problem and then judgment is made on the disputes.According to the question, Rowanda should appeal to U.S. tax court for her tax disputer with IRS so that appropriate decision can be made in legal way.
Other options are incorrect because the United state's court of Appeals, federal claim and district are not the place where tax related disputes are legally handled and heard.Thus, the correct option is option(D).
Answer: Rising food prices affect macroeconomic stability as well as the welfare of net buyers of food. This has a significant impact on poorer households that use a larger proportion of income for food.
Explanation:
Answer: C. because they are easy to use and can accommodate all varieties of information
Explanation:
ape x just took it
with an expected rate of return of 10% and a default risk of 20% over the portfolio life with an expected rate of return of 10% and a default risk of 20% over the portfolio life
<h3>What is
rate of return?</h3>
A return in finance is a profit on an investment. It includes any change in the investment's value and/or cash flows received by the investor, such as interest payments, coupons, cash dividends, stock dividends, or the payoff from a derivative or structured product.
The annual rate of return is the percentage change in an investment's value. For instance, if you assume a 10% annual rate of return, you are anticipating that the value of your investment will rise by 10% each year.
Assume an investor paid $950 for a short-term bond, such as a US Treasury Bill, and redeemed it at maturity for its face value of $1000.
To know more about rate of return follow the link:
brainly.com/question/24301559
#SPJ4
Answer:
Part (a)
Buying of land would be smart thought if the net present estimation of advantage is at any rate equal to or more prominent than the present estimation of cost of land.
Net present estimation of land = 
= $1,825,592.54
The expense of land is anyway $2,000,000. The net present expense of land is more noteworthy than the advantages. Subsequently it isn't a good thought to purchase the land.
Part (b)
The maximum sum that ought to be paid ought to be equivalent to the net present estimation of advantages, for example $1,825,592.54.
Part (c)
If the entertainment benefits increment by 3 years then the net present estimation of advantages for a long time would be:
= ![\frac{100,000 * [ 1 - (1.03/1.05)^{50} ] }{(0.05-0.03)}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B100%2C000%20%2A%20%5B%201%20-%20%281.03%2F1.05%29%5E%7B50%7D%20%20%5D%20%7D%7B%280.05-0.03%29%7D)
=$3088535.28
The land should be purchased since the present estimation of advantages is more prominent than cost.
