1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Murljashka [212]
2 years ago
11

How does the temperance movement compare to the other movements of the Progressive Era?

History
1 answer:
Harlamova29_29 [7]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The Eighteenth Amendment to the Constitution prohibited the manufacture, sale, or transport of alcoholic beverages. It was the product of a temperance movement that began in the 1830s. The movement grew in the Progressive Era, when social problems such as poverty and drunkenness gained public attention.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which of the following was an important long-term effect of the Mongol invasions in Eurasia?
musickatia [10]

Answer:

Option: The destruction of trading routes in Eurasia.

Explanation:          

Mongol's military conquest led the empire to widespread. They are known as Nomadic horse people from the eastern steppe lands of Asia. The Mongols briefly ruled most of Eastern Europe, Asia and the Middle East. The Mongol conquest in Eurasia led to the decline of established empires along with killing people. Even though the Mongol tried to assimilate the Persian culture but could not survive as the Mongol regime in Persia declined in the 1330s. Trade disrupt in the East led to the Europeans to take the sea route to reach Asia for trade.  

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements best describes the importance of the Battle of Guadacanal ?
Evgesh-ka [11]

B. Allied forces began to take the offensive for the first time in the Pacific.

The offensive on Guadalcanal gave the Allies an important foothold with a very strategic airfield from which to launch missions from in the Pacific.

6 0
3 years ago
Why was world war ll in a global war? what countries outside of europe participated in this war? which slide did they support? w
Stels [109]

Answer:

The reason why WWII was a global war was because the whole war was surrounded and centered with big powers such as Great Britain, Germany, Russia, France, Italy, Japan, and the United States.

The countries outside of Europe that participated in this war was Germany, Russia, Japan, and the United States.

Europe supported the allied forces. ( Soviet Union, United States, France, Great Britain.)

Their contribution to their side of the campaign was being an helping hand to both United States and the Soviet Union and plus they also aided the soldiers.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT considered one of the three classical civilizations?
rusak2 [61]

B is the correct answer.

While the Indus Valley has gotten more attention in recent years, it is not considered one of the three classical civilizations.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What four things should you look for when analyzing sources in history?
skad [1K]

When you analyze a primary source, you are undertaking the most important job of the historian. There is no better way to understand events in the past than by examining the sources--whether journals, newspaper articles, letters, court case records, novels, artworks, music or autobiographies--that people from that period left behind.

Each historian, including you, will approach a source with a different set of experiences and skills, and will therefore interpret the document differently. Remember that there is no one right interpretation. However, if you do not do a careful and thorough job, you might arrive at a wrong interpretation.

In order to analyze a primary source you need information about two things: the document itself, and the era from which it comes. You can base your information about the time period on the readings you do in class and on lectures. On your own you need to think about the document itself. The following questions may be helpful to you as you begin to analyze the sources:

1. Look at the physical nature of your source. This is particularly important and powerful if you are dealing with an original source (i.e., an actual old letter, rather than a transcribed and published version of the same letter). What can you learn from the form of the source? (Was it written on fancy paper in elegant handwriting, or on scrap-paper, scribbled in pencil?) What does this tell you?

2. Think about the purpose of the source. What was the author's message or argument? What was he/she trying to get across? Is the message explicit, or are there implicit messages as well?

3. How does the author try to get the message across? What methods does he/she use?

4. What do you know about the author? Race, sex, class, occupation, religion, age, region, political beliefs? Does any of this matter? How?

5. Who constituted the intended audience? Was this source meant for one person's eyes, or for the public? How does that affect the source?

6. What can a careful reading of the text (even if it is an object) tell you? How does the language work? What are the important metaphors or symbols? What can the author's choice of words tell you? What about the silences--what does the author choose NOT to talk about?

Now you can evaluate the source as historical evidence.

1. Is it prescriptive--telling you what people thought should happen--or descriptive--telling you what people thought did happen?

2. Does it describe ideology and/or behavior?

3. Does it tell you about the beliefs/actions of the elite, or of "ordinary" people? From whose perspective?

4. What historical questions can you answer using this source? What are the benefits of using this kind of source?

5. What questions can this source NOT help you answer? What are the limitations of this type of source?

6. If we have read other historians' interpretations of this source or sources like this one, how does your analysis fit with theirs? In your opinion, does this source support or challenge their argument?

Remember, you cannot address each and every one of these questions in your presentation or in your paper, and I wouldn't want you to.



hope it helps

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1. Referencing the map of India, please state the neighboring countries with whom India shares its borders. Are there any natura
    14·1 answer
  • Americans possessed national pride but lacked outside possessions.<br><br> True<br> False
    6·1 answer
  • Please match the word to the correct definition.
    11·2 answers
  • More than 100 years after Akbar's death, the Mughal Empire began to fall apart. What were two of the reasons that caused this to
    10·1 answer
  • In japan, the _ had nearly total power, but he was also assitied by _
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a purpose of international organizations?
    5·1 answer
  • I need help with this history diagram
    9·1 answer
  • Why was fighting against the British Royal Navy a challenge for the Americans?​
    9·1 answer
  • Why did the Texans fought in the civil war
    11·1 answer
  • Who was the 6th president of the usa?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!