<span>The interlopers deals with many themes which might develop the central ideas of the story. For example, the concepts of property, identity and power. The changing of interlopers that brings the idea of the outsiders getting in the way of men. Another element might be the nature vs the man, death, class conditions, etc </span>
Uses energy from section 5 developing the palm because what else is he getting
Answer:
In the Elizabethan period, only women belonging to the nobility had access to education. Shakespeare’s father was a merchant, and his family did not belong to the noble class. Given the social codes of the time, his sister would have no access to education and, therefore, writing would be out of the question. Acting would not be possible, either, because women were not allowed on stage. She would instead be trained in how to be a good wife, a good cook, and a good mother.
If Shakespeare’s sister wanted to break the mold and pursue her dreams, society would be hostile to her. She likely would not have the support of family members. She also would have been unlikely to find work as an actor in London. In short, it would be nearly impossible for a single woman of Shakespeare’s time to succeed in the male-dominated world of acting and writing.
Explanation:
hope this helps :)
If the choices are what I think they are the answer would be - Pestilent
Picked paragraph:
I had the feeling of coming home, of awakening from an inauthentic life. It wasn't as if I thought my self-authority was more important than external authority, but it wasn't less important either. We are both communal and uniquely ourselves, not either-or.
My interest was piqued by this paragraph because it details the realisation of a previously unknown or suppressed idea that comes to fruition through experience. This passages gives the power of logos. I feel this way because the author reasoning why their point of view changed in a logical way. They explain how their point of view changed once they had experienced something different from the norm. She reasons that people are both communible and unique. This passages power also comes from pathis, as the passage invoked a feeling of connection to the author when the author connects the readers to the situation through the use of "we".