Answer:
A limiting factor is anything that constrains a population's size and slows or stops it from growing. Some examples of limiting factors are biotic, like food, mates, and competition with other organisms for resources. Others are abiotic, like space, temperature, altitude, and amount of sunlight available in an environment. Limiting factors are usually expressed as a lack of a particular resource. For example, if there are not enough prey animals in a forest to feed a large population of predators, then food becomes a limiting factor. Likewise, if there is not enough space in a pond for a large number of fish, then space becomes a limiting factor. There can be many different limiting factors at work in a single habitat, and the same limiting factors can affect the populations of both plant and animal species. Ultimately, limiting factors determine a habitat's carrying capacity, which is the maximum size of the population it can support.
Explanation:
https://www.nationalgeographic.org/topics/limiting-factors/?q=&page=1&per_page=25
Answer:
The teeth in the mouth bite off a piece of food.
The teeth continue to break the food into smaller pieces.
Saliva rushes into the mouth and mixes with the broken-down food.
The food travels down the esophagus.
The muscles of the stomach churn the food and continue to break it down.
The broken-down food, called chyme, enters the small intestine.
The remaining food passes into the large intestine. Water is absorbed from the large intestine and the rest of
the material is stored as solid waste until it is excreted from the body.
Explanation:
Answer: Answer is below in the explanation.
Explanation:
As shown in the animation from my school, a DNA molecule wraps around histone proteins to form tight loops called nucleosomes. These nucleosomes coil and stack together to form fibers called chromatin. Chromatin, in turn, loops and folds with the help of additional proteins to form chromosomes.
(Link my school used https://www.biointeractive.org/classroom-resources/how-dna-packaged )
Here you need to put if you have any questions about the material you are learning. If you have none i would consider putting that you have none.
Answer: C
. They should map out a grid to systematically look for evidence.
Explanation:
As a crime has been committed, the investigators do not need a search warrant so there is no need to ask a Judge for one so option A is incorrect.
It is best if evidence is searched for in different locations not just the primary scene so option B is incorrect.
Setting up a grip to enable the systematic analysis of evidence is their most likely course of action so option C is correct.
Even if the case is not complicated, evidence still needs to be searched for so option D is wrong.
