Answer:
Berlin
Explanation:
Korea and Cuba both still have communist states. Berlin was divided after WWII and the eastern half was under the control of the soviet union, however, the U.S. successfully integrated west berlin into a democratic capitalist society, and after the fall of the U.S.S.R Berlin and Germany was successfully reunified and Germany is still a democratic, capitalist state.
Gail is using the supporting style of leadership.
She made it clear to her employees that she is there for them and that she understands that they are tired and want to go home as much as she does. She is asking them politely to bear with her for a little while until they finish the task they are supposed to complete.
Answer:
(D) control strategy
Explanation:
According to my research on the strategies provided as answers, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Kevin is using a technique known as a Control Strategy. This strategy used to control the formation and execution of strategic plans. In this case Kevin is grouping different objects together as a control method for remembering the list.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
spending matches revenue.
Explanation:
Here are general terms that are usually used by the government in order to show the condition of their budget at the end of each presidential terms:
If the Revenue is greater than spending - Surplus
If the Spending is Greater than Revenue - Deficit
If the Spending is equal to the Revenue - Balanced
In a Balanced condition, the government managed to efficiently use all the funds from the proposed budget to pay for all the programs that they created during the presidential terms.
Ideally, every presidential terms will always aim to either get a Surplus or Balanced Budget at the end of their terms. Deficit condition usually lead to an increase of National's Debt.
Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
