Answer:
Explanation:Hello. You did not show the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered accurately. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
It is only possible to know the inference that the author made with the reading of the text. However, an inference is a conclusion, which can only be established through the analysis of facts and arguments, which trigger a conclusion, an opinion on the subject. In this case, to answer your question, you should look at how the author's arguments about the students' return lead to a conclusion that must be made on this subject.
Answer:
A and C
Explanation:
Sometimes they sat down on the sea, near patches of brown seaweed that rolled on the waves with a movement like carpets on a line in a gale.
The bird flew parallel to the boat and did not circle, but made short sidelong jumps in the air in chicken-fashion.
Mother Nature has no fears, it doesn´t matter for Her if mankind could have some kind of fear.
The wealthy owner of wide stretches of hunting grounds and forest in the Carpathian Mountains, Ulrich most closely guards one particular strip of forest because Georg Znaeym also claims ownership over it. In Ulrich’s grandfather’s time, his family used the court to seize the land from the neighboring Znaeym family, who the Gradwitzs believed illegally possessed the land. The Znaeyms never accepted the court’s decision, and have continued to hunt in the forest patch. Ulrich has become even more devoted to protecting the land and defeating the Znaeyms than the earlier generations of his family were. He roams the forest with a posse of men and his rifle, hoping to shoot Georg instead of game. However, when Ulrich is finally alone with Georg, a near-death experience causes Ulrich to rethink his priorities, and offer peace and friendship to his life-long rival.
I didnt want to give you the answer right away but this will hopefully help you if it didnt just let me know and ill help you again.
Please restate your question so it makes sense and I will be glad to help.
1. a modern day conflict that could exist between two groups of teens is an argument where each person feels as though they’re the victim in a situation. the conflict could exist between two members and the others are defending each side. ex/ a member of group A’s friend has been mean to a member of group B’s. B feels as though it’s unfair group A continued to be friends with that person even after they hurt them. Group A’s is upset because they feel as though they shouldn’t have to unfriend that person just because they hurt someone else.
