Answer:
ha ha ha... yesno
Step-by-step wrong explanation:
becoause it is the dilemma of the miniyamma
Explanation:
<u>Statement 2</u>:
Angle J is congruent to itself
<u>Reason 2</u>:
Reflexive property of congruence
__
<u>Statement 3</u>:
ΔHIJ ~ ΔGHJ
<u>Reason 3</u>:
SAS similarity theorem
_____
The sides given as proportional (having the same ratio) are corresponding sides in the two triangles. The first pair of sides (HJ, GJ) are named by the first and last letters of the triangle names, so correspond. The second pair of sides (IJ, HJ) are named by the last two letters of the triangle names, so correspond.
The angle between these corresponding sides is the one at the vertex whose name is the point shared by the sides. In the first triangle, the two sides of interest are HJ and IJ, which share the point at J. Thus angle J is the angle between these two sides. In the second triangle, the two sides of interest are GJ and HJ, which share the point at J. Hence angle J is the angle between these two sides, also.
So, we have corresponding sides that are proportional and the angle between them that is congruent (to itself). This allows us to invoke the SAS theorem for triangle similarity.
First, you would find the mean of the data. Once you have the number, you would find the difference between the mean and the other numbers. Once you have all of those numbers, you find the mean of that set. For example:
The mean of this set is 9. We then use this number to find the difference between all of the numbers. So 14-9= 5, 9-7=2, 9-6=3, 9-5=4, 13-9=4. Finding the mean of 5, 2, 3, 4, and 4 results in 18/5 or 3.6
3.6 is the mean absolute deviation.
