1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dsp73
3 years ago
10

How is the republic different from direct democracy

History
2 answers:
svlad2 [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

hi here is your answer hope it helps or then sry

Explanation:

In a pure democracy, laws are made directly by the voting majority leaving the rights of the minority largely unprotected. In a republic, laws are made by representatives chosen by the people and must comply with a constitution that specifically protects the rights of the minority from the will of the majority.

Fantom [35]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

In a pure democracy, laws are made directly by the voting majority leaving the rights of the minority largely unprotected. In a republic, laws are made by representatives chosen by the people and must comply with a constitution that specifically protects the rights of the minority from the will of the majority.

You might be interested in
While freedom speech is protected by the bill of rights, why are certain speech acts are still illegal such as yelling “fire” in
Vilka [71]

Answer:

it's obvious...the supreme court nation? u know

Explanation:

Even if the endangerment is the crime, the only act causing the endangerment is the shouting. Consider the question "If you pull a trigger and cause a bullet to fly through the air and kill someone then wouldn't the killing be the crime?" Yet still we might speak about whether this or that defense might be helpful to the shooter even though the charge is murder rather than "shooting."

6 0
3 years ago
Is this Magma or lava Cake?
LiRa [457]

THIS IS MOST PROBABLY CHOCO LAVA CAKE.

6 0
3 years ago
What kind of person investigates the following questions:
Fantom [35]

Answer:

The scientist if the field of sociology of law

Explanation:

The sociology of law is a branch of sociology that studies the interactions of the institute of law with other social institutions. The sphere of interests of the sociology of law includes the study of the genesis, dynamics, structure of legal norms, as well as their social conditioning and role in society.

The subjects of jurisprudence as a science and sociology of law at some points are closely related to each other, but, nevertheless, they should be clearly separated from each other. In the most general sense, the sociology of law is engaged in the study of law as a social institution, that is, the subject of this science is a combination of various types of interaction of law as an institution with society, the dynamics of the development of legal culture, legislative and law-making processes through the prism of the influence of society on them and their impact on it. The effectiveness of created legislation also remains a relevant subject of empirical research.

Another characteristic feature of the object of study of this science is that it focuses not on a narrow analysis of the rule of law, their historical and social prerequisites, but analyzes the system of law in its dynamics, development, and directly considers the behavior of people and groups of people in a constant legislative process and changes in the legal system.

3 0
3 years ago
I NEED HELP
8_murik_8 [283]

Answer:

1.He was an Indian revolutionary leader. He was born in India and was married at the age of 13.He wanted to study medicine, but his father wanted him to study law. In 1888, he went to London to study law and became used to the English lifestyle. He went back to India in 1891 and failed in become a successful lawyer. In 1893, he went to Pretoria, South Africa to be a legal representative of a company. He faced racial discrimination in a train and was removed from the train by a white man. He was affected by the incident and he launched a movement for the better legal status of Indians living in South Africa. In 1977, he requested Indians to not to comply with the law of registration and fingerprint database of Indians, and was jailed for the same. He created commonwealth for resisting people and then adopted Indian attire, dhoti. His hard work paid by validation of Indian marriages in South Africa and abolition of tax on a former indentured Indian labor.He then returned to India and a voice that could reach and convince people. He insisted on using human labor instead of machines and also worked for bringing Hindus and Muslims together. He promoted Swadeshi and revolutionized for an independent India. 

2.Everyone can use nonviolence as long that they do not take weapons. He believed it could achieve peace without going to war, or blood shed.

3. I'm not sure about this one but I hope I helped you enough

Read more on Webcache.googleusercontent.com - https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/question/10169219#readmore

Explanation:

hope this helps

sorry if it dont

3 0
2 years ago
Can u help me plz????
attashe74 [19]

Answer:

Explanation:

The papal deposing power was the most powerful tool of the political authority claimed by and on behalf of the Roman Pontiff, in medieval and early modern thought, amounting to the assertion of the Pope's power to declare a Christian monarch heretical and powerless to rule.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What if the ak 47 was used in the korean war?
    14·1 answer
  • What was one of the most important effects of the War of 1812
    13·1 answer
  • What happens when you get caught ditching from school?
    9·2 answers
  • Ehat way was Islamic expansion into india similar to the way Islam expanded in other areas
    13·1 answer
  • Which of these was a part of the Safavid "Golden Age"?
    6·1 answer
  • In which year did the U.S. stock market crash signaling the onset of the Great Depression?
    13·2 answers
  • What was the basic government unit in Mayan civilization?
    14·2 answers
  • Who is hitler ? hlo guya if hope u guya doing well​
    12·1 answer
  • President Johnson vetoed the Civil Rights Act of 1866 because____________________.
    15·2 answers
  • And then decided Caesar's
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!