This is called, <span>selfishness</span>
Answer:
D. All of the above.
Explanation:
The AICPA's Acts Discreditable Rule at item 1.400.001.10, describe that an AICPA's member can be guilty of committing an act discreditable to the profession if he/she violates any antidiscrimination laws (no matter if it is at federal, state or municipality level), and this item also includes laws related to harassment of any kind.
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
The overjustification effect is a term in psychology that is described as an act when used diminishes intrinsic motivation; this effect takes place when a reward (introduction of an extrinsic reward ) is been attached as a motivator of behavior, as a result, decreases the intrinsic motivation (behavior that is driven by internal rewards) to do something. Incentive such as money, gift, praise etc are introduced after a behavior can lead to lower, rather than higher motivation to perform a task
According to the overjustification effect, reinforcements that praise people tend to increase intrinsic motivation, and reinforcement that seeks to control people decrease intrinsic motivation.
Answer:
Peer testimony
Explanation:
A testimony is simply called a given statement by a person who possesses a reasonable or logical connection to the subject, field or topic and He or she must be a credible source. Mostly, it can be used to either clarify or prove a point.
Peer testimony can simply be defined as when a statement or testimony is being given by an individual who does not have expertise in the that particular area, field or subject that is in question. they can also be called antiauthorities because it's testimony source that is neither expert nor celebrity, but likely to the subject of an audience. Paul may not be an expert in that field but he has personal experience with the issue in question.
