Answer:
D
Explanation:
Because their did gave up their culture in place of roman culture
Answer:
Thomas Gibbons won the case Gibbons v. Ogden in 1824 because he <em><u>held a federal license to do business.</u></em>
Explanation:
The Supreme Court case of Gibbons v. Ogden was a case of a territorial issue where the two parties tried to gain superior authority over the rights involved. This court case set the precedent for how state and federal powers are entertained.
Aaron Ogden and Thomas Gibbons were former partners in the steamboat industry. So, when Gibbons got his own steamboat to operate, the issue of who can ply in the waterways became an issue. Ogden has a state permit while Gibbons's was a federal permit.
When Gibbons operates his steamboat on the waterways of New York, Ogden opposed, claiming that Gibbons has no permit. This case became a fight between the state and federal powers, with the issue of who was to have a higher power. And the court agreed or dictated that the federal government has control or precedence over the state.
So, <u>Gibbons won the case because of his federal licence against Ogden's state licence</u>.
Answer:
Napoleon's invasion failed and lost almost 90% of his Great Army.
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is:
C. "Both the main river and its smaller branches provided a means of transportation, and the Penobscot were extremely skilled at making canoes from the bark of birch trees...."
Explanation:
I just read the passage, and based on the Penobscot Indians passage, this key detail described how the tribe adapted over time to the landscape, in learning how to make canoes to transport themselves on the river.
<em>Hope this helps! Feel free to give me Brainliest if you feel this helped. Have a good day and a good rest of 2021. :)</em>
Answer:
The answer is B.
Explanation:
They all had the same idea of the solar system. Back then, that would have gone against what people thought and believed in.
