The answer to the question above is "C) Precedent" which is the kind of reasoning that Justice Fortas uses to support his argument when he refers to Keyishian v Board of Regents in the majority opinion for Tinker v Des Moines<span>. The precedent is the kind of reasoning which a person uses by using legal aspect support. Abe Fortas is a man with a law background. Thus, precedent is the most likely kind of reasoning he uses.</span>
If u have the same question like me then your answer would be D) complexity of character
Answer:
There’s a man lying down on the pavement over there. Do you think he <u>may/might have hurt</u> himself?
Explanation:
In the second sentence, modal verbs <em>may </em>and <em>might </em>can be used. These verbs are used to express the possibility of something happening.
The constructions <em>may/might + have + past participle</em> and<em> may/might + be + present participle</em> are used to talk about possible events in the past, present, and future. Since the given event took place in the past (the man is now lying on the pavement because he may have hurt himself earlier), the construction with the past participle will be used. That's how we'll get the sentence:
<em>Do you think he </em><u><em>may/might have hurt</em></u><em> himself? </em>
Having good listening skills enables you to do better in a certain subject, have better conversations