1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
emmasim [6.3K]
3 years ago
9

Felix and Sam are roommates. They both want the dishes to be washed, but each would prefer that the other person do it. Using th

e decision matrix below, where their preferences are ranked from 1 (lowest) to 4 (highest), consider what the outcomes will be in the below scenarios. a. If Sam does dishes: (Click to select) . b. If Sam does not do dishes: Felix will not do the dishes either . c. If Felix does dishes: (Click to select) . d. If Felix does not do dishes: (Click to select) . The likely outcome is that: multiple choice 5 Felix will do the dishes. Felix and Sam will do the dishes together. There will be dirty dishes in the sink. Sam will do the dishes.
Business
1 answer:
Artemon [7]3 years ago
4 0
Gcbvfhbbwbjsbdhshwcshahsydjvsjsbdhshdvud
You might be interested in
As of june 30, 2019, great adventures finishes its first 12 months of operations. if suzie wants to prepare financial statements
wariber [46]
<span>As of June 30, 2013, Great Adventures finishes its first 12 months of operations. If Suzie wants to prepare financial statements, part of the process would involve allowing for uncollectible accounts receivable</span>
5 0
2 years ago
Ralph Young was a commercial tour boat operator on the northern coast of Kauai, Hawaii. He was licensed by the state of Hawaii t
Y_Kistochka [10]

Answer:

The correct answer is option (a) The court probably found that the state law was unconstitutional under the supremacy cause.

Explanation:

Solution

From the given questions it states that, What would be the court's most likely response to Ralph's lawsuit.

The court's decision response would be that, I that when the situation arises or occurs in that case, where there is a conflict which arises between federal and state law then in that case federal law must be applied.

7 0
2 years ago
Assume that Parker Co. will receive SF200,000 in 360 days. Assume the following interest rates: U.S. Switzerland 360-day borrowi
frez [133]

Answer:

d. $96,914

Explanation:

Parker Co. can execute money market hedge in following steps:

(1) Parker Co. pledges Receivable of SF200,000 to borrow SF190,476 with rate 5% in Switzerland; SF190,476 = SF200,000/ (1+5%)

so it has to pay interest expense of SF9,524 in 360 days. The receivable of SF200,000 is enough for both principal and interest in 360 days.

(2) Then it sells SF190,476 at spot rate $0.48 to get $91,428

(3) Then it deposits $91,428 in US with rate 6% to get back $96,914 in 360 days ; $96,914 = $91,428 * (1+6%)

3 0
3 years ago
Cherokee Inc. is a merchandiser that provided the following information: Amount Number of units sold 14,000 Selling price per un
timama [110]

Answer:

Results are below.

Explanation:

<u>Traditional format income statement:</u>

COGS= beginning finished inventory + cost of goods manufactured - ending finished inventory

COGS= 10,000 + 86,000 - 23,000

COGS= $73,000

Sales= 14,000*17= 238,000

COGS= (73,000)

Gross profit= 165,000

Total selling expense= (2*14,000 + 19,000)= (47,000)

Total administrative expense= (3*14,000 + 15,000)= (57,000)

Net operating income= 61,000

<u>Contribution margin income statement:</u>

<u>Total variable cost=</u> 73,000 + 14,000*2 + 14,000*3= 143,000

Sales= 14,000*17= 238,000

COGS= (143,000)

Gross profit= 95,000

Total fixed selling expense= (19,000)

Total fixed administrative expense= (15,000)

Net operating income= 61,000

3 0
2 years ago
Axel steals a business law textbook from beth. curt, who does not know that the book is stolen, buys it from axel. curt has comm
alex41 [277]
The answer is that C<span>urt has committed conversion.
Conversion can happen even when a man mistakenly trusted that he or she was qualified for that goods. As such, great aims are not a guard against change. Somebody who occupied stolen products has conferred the tort of change regardless of the possibility that he or she did not know the goods were stolen. In the event that the genuine proprietor brings a tort activity against the purchaser, the purchaser should either restore the property to the proprietor or pay the proprietor the full estimation of the property in spite of having effectively paid the price tag to the thief.
</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • June Smith, a process engineer, has sold her 15-year patent for a new etching process to Silica Labs, Inc. In return, she has re
    7·1 answer
  • Daryl is the founder of a successful smartphone application. He is detail-oriented and has high expectations of his employees. H
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a good conductor of electricity? A. Glass B. Plastic C. Rubber D. Wet skin
    13·2 answers
  • Pierre's Ice Cream Company produces ultra-rich ice cream, which it sells in Cleveland, Ohio, and other neighboring places. Last
    8·1 answer
  • Michele manages employees at maui tours and lodging. she has noticed that one of her employees submits via the computer system t
    5·1 answer
  • Vibrant Company had $850,000 of sales in each of three consecutive years 2016–2018, and it purchased merchandise costing $500,00
    15·1 answer
  • Jake takes out a payday loan of $300. In two weeks, he doesn't have the money to repay it in full. What is one way that Jake can
    7·1 answer
  • The accounts payable ledger has postings from which of the following sets of journals? a.Purchases, cash payments, and general b
    11·1 answer
  • Help!
    10·2 answers
  • What is it called when one power controlled the trade exports?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!