Answer:instructing the German subsidiary to borrow euros from a bank in Germany
Explanation:A company may organize subsidiaries to keep its brand identities separate. This allows each brand to maintain its established goodwill with customers and vendor relationships. Subsidiaries can also help you position part of your business as an alternative to the parent company at a different price point.
The Chicago Company will instruct the German subsidiary to lend Euro from bank in Germany.
Answer:
It is given that in an oligopolistic market, there are at first five firms. At the point when the quantity of fums diminishes to three, it implies that the all out yield will likewise decrease. It is on the grounds that, all the makers are delivering separated items. The inventory of merchandise won't increment in light of the fact that the makers would have expanded the creation before, if that was conceivable. Hence, the balance amount will fall and in view of decrease in amount, cost will increase.
Thus, equilibrium price will likely <u>increase</u> and the equilibrium quantity will likely <u>decrease.</u>
Answer:
1.37 - 1.90
Explanation:
Really hard to say a exact number but here's and idea.
Answer:
Yes, the results are the same in both frameworks. Please see below for explanation.
Explanation:
With regards to the bond supply and demand framework, people will look to buy more bonds since they are more wealthy now. Hence, the supply of bonds will increase. The supply curve and the demand curve will both move to the right, with the former shifting more than the latter. The equilibrium interest rate will increase.
With regards to the liquidity preference framework, once the economy experiences a positive shift, there will also be an increase in the demand for money. People will make an increased number of transactions as well and hence, the demand curve will move towards the right. The equilibrium interest rate will rise too.
Answer:
b. greater under absorption costing than variable costing.
Explanation:
The question is to calculate the closing value of inventory and based on the choices, we need to calculate based on both the Absorption Costing and the Variable Costing Methods.
1. Closing Inventory based on Variable Costing Method
Direct Material $40
Direct Labour $30
Variable Overhead $2
Fixed Overhead <u>$0 </u>(this method does not reecognise fixed cost
Totals (Unit cost of Production) $72
Based on this, the closing inventory is $72 x (8,000+50,000-55,000 units)
=$77 x 3,000= $216,000
2. Closing Inventory based on Absorption Costing Method
Direct Material $40
Direct Labour $30
Variable Overhead $2
Fixed Overhead <u>$5</u>
Totals (Unit cost of Production) $77
Based on this, the closing inventory is $77 x (8,000+50,000-55,000 units)
=$77 x 3,000= $231,000
Based on these calculations:
The Ending Inventory is higher/Greater under absorption costing than variable costing and the reason is that variable costing does not recognize fixed cost in determining the value of ending inventory.
