1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Llana [10]
4 years ago
15

The United States acquired several new territories during the late 1800s. Which two eventually became states?

History
2 answers:
JulijaS [17]4 years ago
8 0
The answer to the question is c 
REY [17]4 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is C) Alaska and Hawaii.

The United States acquired several new territories during the late 1800s. The two that eventually became states were Alaska and Hawaii.

Let's see the case of Alaska first. Alaska had been a territory that belonged to Russia since 1744. In 1867, the United States paid Russia $7,200,000 for Alaska. It was until 1959 that Alaska was made state.

In the case of Hawaii, the territory was a kingdom in 1883. One year later, sugar planters and missioners overthrew the Quen with the help of US marines. Then, the islands were part of the United States and became a state in 1959.

You might be interested in
In the mid 1800’s, the Kansas and Nebraska territories were located?
Gemiola [76]
The answer is above the Missouri territories were located. Hope this helps!
5 0
3 years ago
According to President Johnson, what was the purpose<br> of Medicare?
sertanlavr [38]
To save as many lives as possible
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In 1882, congress passed an "exclusion act" which prevented the immigration of workers from what country for 10 years? a china b
Anestetic [448]
It was china i hope if not im sorry


3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the Siege of Vicksburg affect the balance
mafiozo [28]
I think it’s b
I am sorry if I am wrong
5 0
2 years ago
How could having no national court system affect a family that moved from one state to another?
irina1246 [14]

Answer: The family would have to relearn the court system.

Explanation: The moving family would have to relearn the court system in the new state because they are guided by different constitution. An absence of national court in a country indicates that, family moving from one state to another would have to relearn how the court system in their new host state works, however, this is because the law that is used by a particular state might be different from another, and only a national court law can affect all states.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • One day six Tories paid Nancy a call and demanded a meal. She soon spread before them smoking venison, hole-cakes, and fresh hon
    6·2 answers
  • What was one outcome of the laissez-faire economic policies
    6·1 answer
  • What position did the United States take during the Indochina Wars
    7·1 answer
  • The constitution would go into effect if _______ states ratified the new plan of government.
    6·1 answer
  • Which group once took control of Egypt and ruled for half a century? Kupelletes Nubians retricerians Phoenicians
    6·1 answer
  • I'm currently writing a research paper on the black death.
    7·1 answer
  • The following question is based on your reading of the short stories of Flannery O’Connor.
    14·1 answer
  • )Article21oftheConstitutionGuarantees-
    6·1 answer
  • Why did general macarthur address congress after he was fired?
    13·2 answers
  • How did the spanish missions in california differ from those in texas and new mexico
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!