The author is trying to establish the point that the food provided to the soldiers was of poor quality and in little quantity.
<h3>How can we identify this?</h3>
- The author shows how the food provided to the soldiers was compared to fodder, that is, food inappropriate for humans.
- The author shows how this food could be compared with the feeding of pigs, which highlights the poor quality of the food.
- The author reinforces how inappropriate food was consumed anyway, as it was all the soldiers had.
In the text, the author wants to draw attention to how the soldiers were neglected and fed in a precarious, unhealthy, and insufficient way, not being possible to compare it with food for humans.
This kind of food left the soldiers hungry and weak, preventing them from being able to fulfill their responsibilities as required.
In this case, the author satirizes food, trying to call attention to a change and showing the dissatisfaction of those who need to eat this way.
Learn more about satire:
brainly.com/question/20772859
#SPJ1
Answer:
I personally would not. The unsanitary conditions are just not something that entice me. As well as the horrible economic system and the unfair wages and taxation, it would be a very unenjoyable time to live in.
Explanation:
My opinion, feel free to use it as your answer :)
Answer: The Dutch were the only one's successful in trading with Japan until the 1800's.
Explanation: :)
<span>By the early 19th century, many Shawnee and other Ohio Valley Indians were becoming increasingly dependent on trading with the Americans for guns, cloth, and metal goods. Tecumseh spoke out against such dependence and called for a return to traditional Indian ways</span>
Cultural: The Enlightenment philosophy desacralized the authority of the monarchy and the Catholic Church, and promoted a new society based on reason instead of traditions.
Social: The emergence of an influential bourgeoisie which was formally part of the Third Estate (commoners) but had evolved into a caste with its own agenda and aspired to political equality with the clergy (First Estate) and the aristocracy (Second Estate).
Financial: France's debt, aggravated by French involvement in the American Revolution, led Louis XVI to implement new taxations and to reduce privileges.
Political: Louis XVI faced strong opposition from provincial parlements which were the spearheads of the privileged classes' resistance to royal reforms.
Economic: The deregulation of the grain market, advocated by liberal economists, resulted in an increase in bread prices. In periods of bad harvests, it would lead to food scarcity which would prompt the masses to revolt.
