Answer:
two decades
Explanation:
The World Bank suggested technological progress and economic growth rates were contained in their 2008 report which further recognizes that the rural and low-technology products such as corn can gain from the different technological innovations that are happening while mobile banking can aid those that require low technology market vending. All these are the outcome of Technological globalization.
Answer:
No, their economic cost of enrolling in the business program is not the same for both,
Explanation:
The explicit costs of going back to college are the same for Walter and Jesse, e.g. they might be $20,000 per year, or even $30,000 doesn't matter for this analysis. But Walter is currently working as a teacher and that means taht if he decides to go to college, his implicit costs will include the forgone salary as a teacher which is $50,000 per year. Implicit costs are opportunity costs, i.e. additional costs or benefits lost from choosing one activity or investment instead of another alternative.
Since Jesse is not working, whether she goes back to college or not will not affect her income, it will still be $0, but if Walter goes back to college he will lose his salary.
Answer: C. Bridget drives her car after having too much alcohol to drink.
Explanation:
The external cost, also known as third party cost, is all negative cost that a third party receives for a good buying for us, that is, the negative effect that will happen for something that we consume. For example, when we buy a vehicle, the external cost is the emission of gases that are harmful to the environment.
In this case, the external cost is the danger to drivers and pedestrians because Bridget bought alcohol and then drove.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
No, Langstraat cannot disaffirm his rejection for the uninsured motorist coverage. Since Langstraat is a minor, he can legally disaffirm a contract, but by doing so, he will disaffirm the entire contract, not just one or two previsions of his choice.
In this specific case, Langstraat can disaffirm the whole insurance policy contract, but he cannot disaffirm only one clause. If he chooses to disaffirm the whole policy, the result will be the same, he will not have coverage.
