Answer:
Loss
Explanation:
Because she started with 860.00 then ended with 300
Answer:
1. Yes
2. - privacy concerns
- may lack full details.
Explanation:
1. In this scenario the automobile auction house would need to show video evidence of his (San Rafael's) fraud activities to the investigator.
2. Privacy concerns such as how the information gotten from video surveillance is used may pose a challenge.
There's also the reality of a lack of full details. For instance, San Rafael may be deaf a disability that cannot be reflected well on a surveillance video that shows him working.
Answer:
Red Cross took the right decision by reversing the original decision of diverting the donations. If it had diverted the donations donor will loose trust in the organisation and will not come forward to help. When it maintains a policy of honoring donor intent people will trust it to stand by it and they donated for the victims of the terrorist attack and the donations must be spent on it only. Then the trust of the donors will not fall and if the organisation wants donations for other ancillary operation sit can genuinely ask for donations and there are many people who would be willing to help. This gives both trust and respect and also the cause is served. Hence the decision to reverse the original one is correct and a good move.
The answer is shown below:
Regina apologized to clay for an e-mail that upset him. She said she had chosen an inconsiderate way of stating her idea and that she had been happy to discuss further. Regina is "Expressing consideration behavior ".