1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kap26 [50]
2 years ago
11

Was reversing Reconstruction a good or bad thing?

History
1 answer:
mojhsa [17]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

People in this country were

tired of Reconstruction by

the middle of the 1870s.

Southerners were not happy

with the government. They

saw it as a group of people

who did nothing but tax

people and then spend the

money. At the same time,

the Federal army was

leaving the South. Whites

were gaining back the power they lost right after the war ended.

The effort to help the South was not a total failure. The Union had

also been saved. By the 1870s, all of the Southern states were part of

the Union again. The South was rebuilding its cities. They were

growing quickly. People who had left were coming back to start their

lives over again.

As farms were rebuilt, people in the South grew crops that weren't

food. Some of these products were tobacco and sugar. Farmers began

to earn good money again. But this meant that they were growing less

food to feed the people who lived there. Much of the food was

shipped in from other parts of the country.

Blacks had gained more rights. The Thirteenth Amendment banned

slavery in the country. The Fourteenth Amendment said that blacks in

the country were now citizens. Blacks also had gained the right to

vote. That was given in the Fifteenth Amendment.

Organizations were being started. They would help blacks get jobs

and go to school. One group was the Freedmen's Bureau. This group

helped to start many schools for blacks to attend. The group also tried

to help them with problems that they faced every day.

Reconstruction was not all good. There were bad things that

happened because of it, too. Former slaves were stuck in poverty. As

their children grew up, they also lived in poverty. This cycle would go

on for many years.

Blacks being poor kept them from doing many things. They did not

have enough money to buy land. Whites continued to keep them from

owning businesses. Even if they could open a business, most of them

did not have the money to do it.

After the Civil War, the Federal army was in the South. But when

Reconstruction ended, the army left. Blacks were scared. Now, there

was no one to protect them. Organizations like the Ku Klux Klan or

KKK started. These groups of people kept blacks from voting in

elections.

Just because blacks were now supposed to be equal to whites didn't

mean that they were treated that way. Whites living in the South and

the North did not see blacks as equals. Even though they were no

longer slaves, blacks were still treated as if they were.

While farming was good for the South, it was also bad. The focus on

farming meant that there weren't a lot of factories being built. The

North had a lot more factories to make the things that people needed

and wanted. People in the South had to pay more for these same

goods because they had to be sent to that part of the country.

Many people in the North and South were bitter after the war ended.

Reconstruction did not help that. The South was angry with how its

people were treated after the war. The way they were treated meant

they did not trust many people who were in politics.

Many people today believe that Reconstruction was a total failure. As

we look back, we can see that there were some good points. Still,

many groups of people including blacks and women would have to

fight for rights that would make them equal to white men. ( THIS SHOULD HELP)

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which statement most completly explains why the french settled in new france
Lera25 [3.4K]

They came to trade fur, they also were looking for new land and a good route to the Pacific, and sought to convert American Indians. :)

7 0
3 years ago
Without george washingtons invention, what aspect of life most likely would be impacted
Simora [160]

delivery of electricity

He contributed to the electrical industry.

6 0
3 years ago
This type of government has total control over the people's lives. People have no individual choices.
iren2701 [21]
The answer would be Communism
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these words describes the people of the Americas as Columbus found them?
ehidna [41]

The correct answer is letter A

Explanation: The discovery Christopher Columbus was important because it led to the colonization of the Americas. He thought he had arrived in India, that was his object. But when he arrived there he met natives who were very obedient and docile.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did federalists believe that the 1787 Constitution was complete and preserved individual liberty?
grigory [225]

Answer:

The Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new constitution was sufficient. The anti-federalists demanded a bill of rights.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • When was joseph hewes born, what date, and place
    15·2 answers
  • Why did john f. kennedy consider civil rights a moral crisis for the nation?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the definition of a common market?
    14·2 answers
  • What was the one fatal flaw in the weimar constitution
    11·1 answer
  • How many presidents was there
    15·2 answers
  • Write an essay on chola administration and their contribution to art and architecture.​
    5·1 answer
  • Please research Temperate Forest and write a short paragraph (about 3 sentences) explaining and describing it.
    5·1 answer
  • Which types of government was created in the U.S. by the constitution?
    11·1 answer
  • I can't find the answers in the textbook anywhere!
    15·1 answer
  • First government, congress could negotiate treaties and declare war, no executive branch
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!