"<span>d. He attempted to change Greek art, so that it would exemplify the violence and emotions surrounding the defeat of the Persians" is not true regarding Pericles, since there was no such "control" of art in general. </span>
Although negotiations may be effective, but legal trade will serve as the best international aid for the combat of drug trafficking.
<h3>What is drug trafficking?</h3>
Drug trafficking can often be understood as the smuggling or illegal trade of the prohibited drugs and other such commodities via loopholes in the international laws.
Drug trafficking can be avoided by two or more governments by the way of negotiations; however, a more solid aid will be provided by the legalization of trade of drugs to a certain limit.
Hence, option B; Legal trade is one of the best ways that provided international aid against the drug trafficking.
Learn more about drug trafficking here:
brainly.com/question/16939546
Answer:
A. Italian city-states were unified under one central government long before most other European countries, and that allowed the government to sponsor the arts.
C. Italy is in a good, central location for business and commerce so traders maintained contact with people and ideas from other places.
Explanation:
Although a greater example is that there were many rich patrons who were willing to subsidize many art projects and artists.
Answer:
Explanation:
The United States Constitution prohibits legislative bills of attainder. Which is indicated in federal law under Article I, Section 9, and in state law under Article I, Section 10. Being banned under state law reflects the significance that the framers are connected to this issue.
The clauses that are prohibiting attainder laws serve two purposes within the U.S. Constitution. They strengthened the separation of powers by means of prohibiting the legislature to execute judicial or executive functions, because the result of any such acts of legislature would take the form of a bill of attainder. Additionally, they incorporate the conceptualization of due process, that was relatively reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states that "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed". Moreover, the constitution of every state clearly progibits bills of attainder as well. For instance, the Wisconsin's constitution under Article I, Section 12 states that, “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.” On the contrary, the Texas version under Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws, Impairing Obligation of Contracts states that, "No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made". It is not clear though whether a contract that calls for heirs to be denied of their estate is permitted under this law.
Hello!
The correct answer is A: The Declaration of Independence.
The declaration was ratified on July 4, 1776. However, it was not signed until early August later that year. The approval of the Declaration of Independence is the reason that Independence Day is celebrated every year on the Fourth of July.
I hope this helps you! Have a great day!
