Answer:
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed by the U.S. Congress on May 30, 1854. It allowed people in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery within their borders. The Act served to repeal the Missouri Compromise of 1820 which prohibited slavery north of latitude 36°30 it led into decades called bloody kansas, where pro and anti slavery groups fought
Explanation:
B
Hope it helps
Sorry if it’s not right
Answer:
Well other than the obvious fact that it is dangerous because its outlying kingdoms were vulnerable to invasion. Another thing they had to worry about was certain trading groups would become too dependent on their necessary goods.
The Vedic Age in India (c. 1500 BC-c. 500 BC), also known as the Vedic Period, was the time when the Vedas (the oldest sacred texts in India) were written. During the earliest part of this period and even the period which preceded it, economy was mainly characterized as being self-sufficient, so trade was not so popular. This meant that there were some drawbacks of voluntary trade, for example:
- little scope for product exchange
- households produced just the necessary supplies for the family
- the surplus was stored for future use
- the different neighboring areas were not connected by trade, as they were self-sufficient
- each farm produced their own grains, clothing and other commodities
- roads were poorly made, so trade was difficult - they traveled down the rivers instead of roads
- economic exchange was in the form of gift-giving
Explanation:
Hope this helps
If so pls mark brainliest :D
Magellan wasn't worth defending because he burnt down a village and he killed people. he was also bad to his fleet. he yelled at them and forced them to eat food that was bad for them and has been sitting there for days. So those are a few reasons to why he didn't deserve someone defending him. <br />
Overall, the Truman Doctrine had both advantages and disadvantages. The Truman Doctrine and the Development of American Foreign Policy during the era of the “Cold War” defined foreign policy. It was a major break from the U.S. trends of isolationist and foreign policy. One advantage of the doctrine was to end the loss of military life and support people those who resisted the attempt of defeat by armed minorities. The containment policy was another advantage, it strengthened the United States economy over the Soviet Union. The Marshall Pan however, allowed an economic advantage due to the Soviets weaker economy. They had no choice but to increase their spending. Consequently, thousands of American lives were saved since there was never a direct conflict amongst the two countries, it essentially lessened the chance of an all-out nuclear war. On the other hand, the disadvantages forced other countries to oversee the use of America using nuclear weapons. Even though they knew the capabilities of the U.S., many countries underestimated their abilities. Together using the Marshall Plan, the doctrine solidified the Western European countries into accepting the realism of a divided Europe. The containment policy in addition to the influence of the Marshall Plan industrialized a structure with which the lightly felt, yet inevitable tensions were spiraling within Europe in the mid-1947. Not to mention, many criticized that Truman was guilty of initiating half a century of fear over the doctrine.
