Answer:
<u>Sample Response: </u>The argument in favor of social media use is the stronger argument. The article claims that students do better in school when they use social media. The author gives anecdotal evidence that students use social media to discuss classwork, then uses empirical evidence to show that grades went up in a study where students used social media. The argument against social media is weak because it lacks specific evidence. The writer uses the rhetorical device of parallelism to list a variety of ill effects of social media use. However, the writer never offers any evidence for these negative effects. This writer uses the bandwagon fallacy by telling the audience that most people who want to do well do not use social media.
Explanation:
I just did the assignment.
In some areas of poverty, (including parts of southern Texas) there are no speed limits, rather an indication that you may not go above a certain speed if your car lets off more pollution. Some countries have placed speed limits to limit the consumption of fuel and pollution from any one car. But as I have stated, it's not directly because of the speed, but rather the rate of pollution given off when in that state. :)
False, as it could be inferring about many different things.
Answer: you will see things from her perspective and appreciate her more
Explanation: I'm here to help:)
Answer:
For me i would have most comfortable pillow, blankets, and sheets! -w-
Explanation:
