1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zzz [600]
3 years ago
8

What has been the most common reason for one party losing control of the national government? A. The country gets involved in lo

ng-lasting foreign wars. B. The Congress forces the President to give up control. C. A third-party candidate wins a presidential election. D. The country suffers from severe economic problems.
History
1 answer:
Maslowich3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

D. The country suffers from severe economic problems.

Explanation:

When a country is in crisis like the current global pamdemic, ravaging the whole world, and the people perceive that the government is not doing enough to curtail or stop the spread, the ruling party will not get the support of the people thus lose control of the national government possibly in next election.

Also, when there is severe economic problem like 2007-2009 economic recession, where most companies were forced to shut down hence a great deal of people lost their jobs.

As a result of these job losses, people would begin to accuse the government in power as the cause of the economic problem. If the government is being controlled by a party, it would begin to lose support of voters hence might not be able to be re-elected in subsequent elections.

You might be interested in
The rule of law ensures which of the following<br><br> Government actions must be based on the law
Eddi Din [679]

Answer:

The concept of Rule of Law is that the state is governed, not by the ruler or the nominated representatives of the people but by the law. The Constitution of India intended for India to be a country governed by the rule of law. It provides that the constitution shall be the supreme power in the land and the legislative and the executive derive their authority from the constitution. The paper begins by providing an introduction to Dicey’s three pillars on what a Government must be based on and how the Indian Constitution fulfills these three requirements. Later, it discusses the theoretical and practical application of this rule of law in India.

Explanation:

hope it's help you

3 0
3 years ago
Help meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
madreJ [45]
B farming produce a surplus of food
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Representatives from all member nations are represented in
kkurt [141]
The correct answer to this question is letter "d. none of the above." Representatives from all member nations are not represented in the un general assembly, the un veto group, the un security council. This is the correct answer as far as the representative is concerned.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
why does Paine begin his argument for independence with a attack on the principle of monarchy and hereditary succession?
kirill115 [55]
Independence from Britain necessitates independence from Great Britain's rule and governing principles, of which monarchy and hereditary succession are two examples. In order for Americans to want to break free of Britain, they had to believe that Britain's rules and philosophies were unjust; otherwise, there would be no reason to become autonomous.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Some of the delegates to the Convention said that they were exceeding their authority in writing the Constitution. Why did they
qaws [65]
The correct answer here would be C. The usual story goes that Confederation Congress only assigned them to propose the amendments to the Articles but instead they created an entirely new document. This is their reason, among others but none of them are correct as the Convention did not exceed its authority. The Confederation Congress for one was not a government in the true sense of the word. It was more an alliance like NATO. The convention was a also a meeting about just more than the Articles. The convention was beyond the Congress and its opinion was nothing more than that, just an opinion. Furthermore all 13 states ratified the Constitution. So no the Convention did not exceed its authority.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who did the Spanish enslave and use to take gold and silver from the mines of Mexico and Peru?
    10·1 answer
  • Where does beowulfcome from , and why does he travel to herot?
    5·2 answers
  • What was the social and political structure of the New England colonies?
    5·1 answer
  • What’s the function of the president/what does he do as part of the federal government?
    12·1 answer
  • Pleas help if this is correct
    12·1 answer
  • The gods had feelings<br> Group of answer choices<br><br> True<br><br> False
    11·2 answers
  • Explain about Nepal?​
    13·1 answer
  • MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
    8·2 answers
  • write a sentence that explains the difference between a nongovermental organization and govermental organizations?YALL PLEASE AS
    11·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!