The difference between the Social contract theories of both was that Hobbs believed<u> c) that the </u><u>people </u><u>could </u><u>overthrow </u><u>their</u><u> ruler </u><u>if that ruler was </u><u>abusing </u><u>their </u><u>power</u><u>. </u>
<h3>Social Contract according to Locke</h3>
- Government owes citizens the right to protect their property.
- If a government was not performing, they could be removed from power.
Hobbes on the other hand, believed that the government owed nothing to the citizens and so the people could not remove it even if it wasn't performing.
In conclusion, option c is correct.
Find out more on Locke's theory at brainly.com/question/14308888.
C) Rally leaders were illegally arrested and convicted is not an accurate description of the Haymarket Square incident. Some men were arrested for carrying out the planning and construction of a bomb which was thrown and killed some policemen. Americans were in favor of defending the rights of workers and for them to be able to demonstrate and the rally had started as peaceful.
D the plentiful forrest provided alot of lumber and helped fuel the shipbuilding industry ;)
Answer:
They saw them as honorable men. The Etruscans taught the Romans to build with brick and to roof their homes with tiles. They drained the water from marshes that lay between Rome's hills.
