Understatement: is irony (laugh) of something that is pitiful.
Answer: A) they're showing the movie "don't turn out the lights" in a dark theatre.
Because, the movie is telling them to not turn off the lights in the theatre.
B) I think the ushers might question a grocery bag of candy under your sweater, as you can't trust a man will candy.
Answer:
When Orwell relates his experience with the elephant in “Shooting an Elephant” it gives some insight into his own psyche as well as the structure of imperialism. In this moment, he criticizes imperialism, showing that the leaders are controlled by the masses just as much as, if not more so than, the other way around.
He describes himself as being despised by the Burmese people. He is a colonial policeman, and in this role, he is associated with imperial British rule, propped up by the threat of force. (Orwell himself served in the Indian imperial police for a time, so the narrator's voice is likely his own.) When the elephant tears through the bazaar, killing a coolie, the Burmese crowd demands that he shoot and kill it. He does not want to do this, because by the time he arrives on the scene, the elephant has calmed, and no longer poses a threat to anybody. Orwell reflects that, in order to appease the angry crowd, he has to fill the role that they expect of him, which is that of a hated "tyrant." This is the paradoxical nature of empire- he must compromise his morality, become what the Burmese people already think he is, or risk their laughter and scorn. For someone that has already determined that he hates British imperialism, the incident is profoundly unsettling, but in a "roundabout way enlightening." It underscores the duality of empire, a world in which a man like Orwell can, as he says in the account, hold remarkably contradictory feelings:
The incident illustrates that, whatever objections they may have to British rule, imperial officials have to be hated to be respected.
Explanation:
<u>Explanation:</u>
This story narrates the experience of two males, one an older uncle, the other a nephew (age six) to the uncle as they walk <em>"along a trail"</em> home. The Uncle whose age wasn't mentioned seemed surprised by the strength and vitality of his nephew named Kolman, for he said,
<em>"His head barely reaches my waist, but he plies his legs with great activity--circling around me, climbing onto low rocks, picking up sticks to throw downhill."</em>
As they continue their movement along the path, the uncle begins to reflect on what would happen to him physically when he continues to grow old. After observing the way leaves change their color from green in the spring to brown in the autumn, he said within himself,
<em>"I wonder if I am undergoing a similar change. As the urgency of my own green force abates, will formerly obscure aspects of my nature come to light? What will be revealed? Will my aging include the unveiling of a whole new palette of colors, and not a simple fade to gray?</em>
Finally, they both headed "all back to the house where the family waits with dinner".
Oh bjgyfj vufgyugig hvukgygb gujbhig wtf
Answer:
I believe the answer is A. presents all the main points of the subject
