I think it’s true
Sorry if I’m wrong
<u>Answer:</u>
<u>attaining land ownership is worth defending no matter the cost.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Note, the "Apache Legend" story was told by Geronimo a native who had experiences with the settlers (white men as they were called) while "A Brief and True Report of the New Found Land of Virgini" was written by Thomas Hariot a settler.
Nevertheless, despite writing from different backgrounds they share the same view point on land ownership. Both the settlers and the natives strongly hold the idea that the land where they are resident is worth defending, even if it requires killing another.
In fact, this similar idea between them is part of the causes of the deadly conflicts between the natives and the whites.
<em>The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde</em> is a fascinating novel written by Robert Stevenson. It is a thriller and a little spooky which keeps the readers bind and interested.
The passage illustrates the character vs. character conflict.
<h3>The novel can be explained as:</h3>
- The passage lines are a dialogue between Lawyer Utterson and Doctor Jekyll. It shows the conflict between the two characters as they discuss giving everything to Mr Hyde.
- The lawyer disagrees with Dr Jekyll and says to him that Hyde is a terrible man. But the doctor does not agree with the lawyer and asks him to give all of his belonging to Mr Hyde.
Therefore, option 4. character vs. character is illustrated in the passage.
Learn more about The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde here:
brainly.com/question/12701725
An imperative sentence is one in which you order somebody to do something.
So, this sentence could be rewritten as an imperative sentence like this:
Go to the La Brea tar pits!
Answer:
11(vain) 12 become a social worker