Answer:
Moral dilemmas are situations where an individual has to make a choice between two or more clashing options.
These options are often not pleasing to the individual and are usually not truly morally acceptable either. We can identify moral dilemmas by recognising that our actions in these given situations have moral and ethical consequences.
We must choose between which actions to take. However, we may not be happy with any choice, and none of them can be considered fully morally acceptable.
Our first point of order might be to consult any personal moral beliefs or societal ethical and lawful norms in order to resolve such difficulties. Yet, this is often not enough. It may not point towards the best action to take, and it may not even be sufficient in tackling the moral dilemma.
We must find ways of resolving these challenging situations in order to produce the least suffering possible. To do this, it is useful to identify the different types of moral dilemmas that we may find ourselves in.
No sorry next time thank you so much
We can infer here that what actually happened to Ned is that Mr. Reamer angrily carried him up to beat him up. If I am in Ned's shoes, I will be ashamed.
<h3>What is inference?</h3>
Inference actually refers to the conclusion that one arrives to after evaluating the available and necessary evidences. Inference is known to be reached after observation and experiments have been cried out.
We see here the way Mr. Reamer picked Ned shows that he was angry with what Ned said in Navajo.
If one is in Ned's shoes, such person will be ashamed. This is because such act looks insulting. Mr. Reamer, as stated in the passage is seen to be angry and to have to carry Ned like a puppy.
Learn more about inference on brainly.com/question/25913650
#SPJ1
Hi there.
The answers are : #16 B
#17 A
#18 D
To be honest, #16 is kinda confused me
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
Individual stories are an incredible vehicle for sharing encounters. These associations are shaped when audience members relate to a speaker dependent on the standard of comparability.
Sharing individual stories likewise enables the speaker to exhibit his or her weakness, a quality which is attractive in moderators. We will in general interface with the individuals who are eager to convey what needs be and uncover their considerations, emotions, and difficulties.
Individuals who talk adequately additionally have solid conveyance abilities. They shift the rate and volume of the discourse all through, stressing key focuses and delaying between principle thoughts, permitting audience members time to process the data.
Issues with reflection: the essayist doesn't tell his or her considerations and emotions, so there's nobody with whom the peruser can associate and sympathize.
