The above question requires a personal answer, so I can't answer it for you, but I'll show you how to answer it.
First, you must read and understand the difficulties and perspectives on the world that each person presented in the text presents. With that, you should reflect and explain how this perception is and what effects it has on that person.
After that, you should write your answer as follows:
- Introduce the person, the character you want to describe.
- Show this character's view of himself and his views on the world and the people around him.
- Show the difficulties that this character goes through and with that it has an impact on his life.
- Show how you would act if you were in this character's shoes and if your perceptions would be different.
More information:
brainly.com/question/13151627?referrer=searchResults
The narrator is brisk and businesslike;Wheeler takes his time is the answer
Answer: Destroying food resources is more damaging than the use of weapons.
Explanation:
In the aforementioned article, the author explains how using starvation and food insecurity as weapons of war by destroying food resources, can be more damaging than the use of weapons.
Destroying food resources can threaten entire populations as they may starve to death while weapons cannot regularly do so. For instance, Germany could have implemented food destruction policies in WWII that would have killed 20 million Russians and the starvation of Biafra by the Nigerian government during the Biafran war killed many times more Biafrans by the armed conflict did.
