Explanation:
Due to the horrible conditions on the Magellan, the passangers on the ship died a horrific death. The ones that did not resort to eating wood starved; the poor passengers caught dieseses that were carried and transferred by rats and feces. The awful conditions on the Magellan makes you ponder if the ship was worth the sacrifice many innocent people on board the Magellan made.
Forty-five of the 102 Mayflower passengers died in the winter of 1620–21, and the Mayflower colonists suffered greatly during their first winter in the New World from lack of shelter, scurvy, and general conditions on board ship. They were buried on Cole's Hill.
hope it helps
This is quite a complex question. In the USA, the Constitution is not precise about the scope of powers and duties of the different layers and branches of government. It was not until the tenure of John James Marshall, a Federalist judge who served at the SCOTUS between 1801 and 1835, that this complex legal question was clarified during the Marbury v. Madison case.
This case established the principle of Judicial Review, by which the judiciary, one of the three branches of government reviews the actions and/or laws or decrees passed by the other two powers. This means that in terms of Constitutionality, the courts have jurisdiction over the other two branches of government. This is part of the system of Checks and Balances.
Answer:
no
Explanation:
No it was not it could of have been easily avoided if hitler was stopped before anything happened
The correct answer is A.
Brown V. Board of Education was a landmark decision enacted by the US Supreme Court in 1954, that <u>abolished segregation in public schools and understood that the 'separate but equal' principle that had governed such procedures was violating the Equal Protection Clause</u> and therefore, unconstitutional. This clause was introduced by the 14th amendtment to the US Constitution during the Reconstruction Era, aiming to guarantee equality of rights to all US citizens.
This decision (in 195), overturned the former Plessy v. Ferguson decision from 1896, that had understood that the 'separate but equal' principle did not violate the Equal Protection clause and, therefore, it enabled segregation because it stated that Congress did not have power to ban it when public segregated facilities were comparable in quality.
