False. While the author can include his opinion, this shouldn't happen very often, as in a research paper, you are supposed to mainly be stating facts.
Answer:
girls should be allowed to play high school football as long as they are safely protected
part b. there is no quote but heres something from google," Exercise improves learning, memory, and concentration, which can give active girls an advantage when it comes to the classroom."
source: https://kidshealth.org/en/teens/girls-sports.html
Explanation:
From inference, the two words that depict the atmosphere in the passage are:
- excitement (Option A)
- danger. (Option D)
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
When a conclusion is reached based on the information provided, an inference is said to have been made.
The textual evidence that supports the above are words like:
"Then there followed a great to-do through all our old inn, heavy feet pounding to and fro, furniture thrown over, doors kicked in, until the very rocks re-echoed and the men came out again, one after another..."
Hence, the correction answers are options A and D.
Learn more about inference at;
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
The underlined words, posture straightened, and legs bounced showed that Omar was feeling prideful in front of the others. Thus, option A is the correct option.
<h3> What are context clues?</h3>
The complete part of the question is: Underlined words are - posture straightened, and legs bounced.
The context clues are the words that act as a hint and expressions that the readers can understand when they read the passage, story, or paragraph. It helps in learning and understanding new words and expressions.
The words like posture straightened, and legs bounced act as context clues that define Omar's feeling of pride when the names were announced and show the details to the readers.
Therefore, option A. pride is the correct option.
Learn more about context clues here:
brainly.com/question/2303998
#SPJ1
Hello. You did not submit the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, I will try to help you as best I can.
The only way to answer this question is by reading the text it is related to. During this reading, there are two ways in which you can see how effective Powell's appeal is in relation to a two-party approach to political issues. The first way is to analyze the evidence that Powell used to justify his position. In that case, you must assess how far this evidence is consistent with reality and is capable of proving that Powell's opinion is relevant. The second way is to assess how much Powell's opinion is relevant to you and how much you agree with him. If you choose the second option, you will need to use your own evidence to justify your opinion.
