The correct answer is A. Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Explanation:
In a Post hoc ergo proper hoc fallacy the speaker considers one event is the cause of another because one event follows the other in time. This implies the speaker incorrectly assumes one event to be the cause of another without real evidence. This occurs in the example presented because the speaker thinks Jalessa being a President is the cause that the school was broken into. However, there is no evidence Jalessa is the direct cause of this event and this cannot be concluded based on the fact the incident occurred after Jalessa became the class president.
Answer:
using conflict between characters like how Tybalt sees Romeo and wants to fight him, remarkable linguistic devices and, one of the most present themes of the play, love.
B
Explanation:
Answer: He is motivated by financial success.
Explanation:
In George Orwell's <em>Animal Farm</em>, the animals rebel against their human farmer.
Mr. Whymper is a human solicitor hired by Napoleon as an Animal Farm representative. He initiates the interaction between Animal Farm and the society, and is the first human the pigs interact with after the Rebellion.
Whymper is described as<em> "a sly-looking man with side whiskers, a solicitor [lawyer] in a very small way of business, but sharp enough to have realized earlier than anyone else that Animal Farm would need a broker and that the commissions would be worth having" (6.9).</em> This means that Whymper understands that he can earn a lot of money from this job, which is why he acts as an intermediary in the first place.
Answer:
you lost your experience with something or your skills are out of whack and you no longer can do it like you use to
Explanation:
