Answer:
Explanation:
God does not condone this in any way, and this is well established in his word; the bible.
A. Three accounts recorded in the bible are:
i. The assault of Dinah by Scechem the son of Hamor (Genesis 34)
ii. The assault of Uriah's wife by David (2 Samuel 11)
iii. The assault of Tarmar by her step brother, Amnon (1 samuel 13)
B. The consequences of each accounts respectively are:
i. Levi and Simeon (Dinah's brothers) killed the perpetrator and his men.
ii. David killed Uriah, the husband of the woman.
iii. Amnon hated his step sister, Tarmar after the act.
C. In the Old testament, the bible equates sexual assault to murder and gave a divine verdict of death.
The detail that best reveals that Mr. Rainsford opposes Zaroff's idea of the ideal prey is Mr. Rainsford's response near the end of the passage when he states that he is a hunter, not a murderer. This statement shows the reader that Mr. Rainsford believes that Zaroff hunting humans as prey makes him a murderer.
We can deduce here that combining sentences 16 and 17 to introduce a list with a colon gives us: D. Students would have time to do the following: relax, pursue their hobbies, and spend extra time with their families.
<h3>What is colon?</h3>
Colon is actually known to be a punctuation mark which is used in English Language to introduce a list of things.
We see here that combining the two sentences in order to introduce a list, "...the following" followed by colon (:) was introduced. This is correct.
Learn more about colon on brainly.com/question/485512
#SPJ1
It might have been a bad idea because they weren't yet fully tested, so no one was sure if they were safe or reliable. It's like how today, many people are reluctant to buy virtual reality machines: because it a new technology that hasn't been dully developed yet.<span />
