The preposition in question is "on", and its purpose is to show you where the dog chewed. You can remove the preposition to form the sentence "The brown dog chewed the rawhide bone." You can also rearrange it to find the preposition, "on the rawhide bone, the dog chewed" in what is commonly known as the Yoda technique.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
That turtle was on steroids we all know it.
Answer:
Feedback.
Explanation:
Feedback is an output information of the performance of anything.
The gestures given in the question are examples of non-verbal communication. Non-verbal communication is communication that is not communicated through mouth or by words but by body language or gestures.
<u>The given list in question are all forms of feedback from the audience. When an audience listens to the speaker they give non-verbal feedback by making eye contact, nodding their heads on the points they agree with, even facial expressions of the audience is a form of feedback</u>.
So, all elements of the list in the question are a form of feedback.
Answer:
1 : Monster
2: maybe add a made up creature that is something good? e.g: harmonia
3: giant
4: type of flower: pansy
5: power : synonym for power?
6:name of a made up godess e.g: celencia
7: light
8 : own flesh
9 : type of bird? : eagle
10: child
11:skys
12: demi-
Explanation:
using the sentences before the blanks you can come up with some great words that fit !!
<em>hope this helped!!</em>
Answer:
Not a movie, but the Frankenstein musical did a pretty good job of recreating the novel. I watched the movie years ago, but I barely remember it. All I know is that they cut out Henry Clerval and made Victor old. In the novel, Victor is in his early twenties, and so many of the movie remakes make him a stereotypical "mad scientist". That's why I like the musical better than I do the movies. He's played by Hunter Foster, and even if Foster is in his 50's, he still looks and sounds young. His voice perfectly fits Victor, in a sort of "prestigious scientist who needs to take a nap" way. Very specific, but it makes sense. Then there's Henry, who doesn't get a huge part, but he's not that important in the novel either. He's actually there, though, and that's what makes the musical so good! Plus, they stayed true to the novel and made the creature learn English. In so many other adaptations, they make the creature this eight foot tall man who can't speak, while in the novel he has a great dialect and talks better than most people I know. In the musical, they stay true to this and cast someone who has a deep, baritone voice to play him. The casting choices are amazing, the way they stayed with the novel is great, and even as a standalone show the music is wonderful.
Explanation:
