They are like that because they can't always be faulty and may have at least some spark of truth to this theory also as stated earlier a theory in scientific terms is just an observation so it can't really be turned down hence theory.
Hey there!
A Burrowing owl's habitat is destroyed which is due to human activities and will come under Artificial destruction via human influence and not due to a natural destruction like cyclones, High Richter scale earthquakes, hurricanes with extremely high knot speeds, etc. Instead I'll say because of which the population of the burrowing owl will obviously decrease because they're more adapted to "their previous environment" and most likely "wouldn't adapt to a new unfamiliar environment".
To break these contradictions down simply said "they're unaware of the rules, regulations, type of soil, type of trophic levels, number of predatory organisms, etc. this makes it pretty hard to move from their once said naturally provided nature-made habitat to the burrowing owl, which got lost due to habitat annihilation by human cause. Further making the owls to adapt and change their "NATURAL TRAITS" to make it "CUSTOM" because of which these aren't going to help them instead they'd go either extinct by moving to a newly known unfamiliar habitat rather than their naturally nature gifted habitation.
So Yeah, the correct option [after the question mark ends] to be the least likely outcome would've been "the population of species of burrowing owl maybe increase as per arriving in a new habitat or introduced to newly made surroundings". This is "Highly and the most unlikely" or the "least likely predictable outcome" for burrowing owls. Introduction of species to newer habitats without any prior training, kills the species and it's progenies.
Hope this helps you and gives you the detailed analysis for this query for burrowing owls!!!!
An operational definition is used for a behavior so that the
behavior can be properly described and understood. Without an operational
definition, it would be difficult to describe behavior without being subjective.
Therefore, behavior cannot be understood and cannot be correctly addressed. It
is also important to understand how behavior functions so that the antecedents
and consequences of behavior can be observed. Thus, what reinforces or affects the
behavior can be better understood. Lastly, an operational definition is
objective and specific, therefore, behavior can be described across different
settings and times.
Answer:
Explanation:
The objective is to conclude if the statements are true or false based on facts.
1)
True
2) 
False
This is because their ancestor is a Chordate who doesn't have a vertebral column but a notochord.
3) True
4) 
False
This is because the bass is a fish that possess some characteristics traits related to an amphibian (turtle) as compared to a mammal(leopard).
5) 
False
The taxa of turtles share a more common ancestor with frogs compared to bass.
6) 
False
The common distant ancestor for leopards and lancelets is known as Chordates
Although the DNA packaging with histones proteins is mean to form nucleosomes (groups of 8 histones proteins), the higher structures why the genetic material is packaged with those molecules is to form chromosomes, as you said.
