The correct answer is A) a higher chance of reelection.
A potential benefit for a government leader using cost-benefit analysis is a higher chance of reelection.
A correct and useful method of decision-making is CBA or better known as cost-benefit analysis. This method is very simple. You compare your advantages to the disadvantages of the decision. You collect the information at hand and then proceed to make the best decision. In 1840, Julies Dupuit who was an Engineer from France started to use this method successfully. That is why is correct to say that a potential benefit for a government leader using cost-benefit analysis is a higher chance of reelection.
Answer: because two of them could be in the same political parties and this could lead two a tie as well as competition in the same party
Explanation:
I think the answer is President Monroe
<span>Great Britain did no receive any land in Europes mainland during the Congress of Vienna. The country did however, receive considerable holdings in the new colonies. The rest of the nations in the Congress of Vienna, received at least some portion of land in Europe.</span>