<h3>
Answer:</h3>
C. A high school math teacher who encouraged his own son to skip college and focus on learning a trade to "save all that wasted tuition money"
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
The reason why answer choice "C. A high school math teacher who encouraged his own son to skip college and focus on learning a trade to 'save all that wasted tuition money'" would be the correct answer because the high school teacher would have a "cognitive dissonance" in his response.
Cognitive dissonance is is having 2 or multiple beliefs in a topic, in this case, the high school teacher would have 2 beliefs in the topic of higher education.
The high school teacher believes that higher education is very important and that people need to get a higher education, but he tells his own son that the tuition that is going into college is "wasted money." This shows that the high school teacher has cognitive dissonance because he has two different beliefs. He believes that higher education is very important, but doesn't want his own son to pursue it because of the tuition costs.
<h3>I hope this helped you out.</h3><h3>Good luck on your academics.</h3><h3>Have a fantastic day!</h3>
<span>The Whiskey Rebellion was a tax protest in 1791 during the
presidency of George Washington. It is also known today as the Whiskey
Insurrections. This “whiskey tax” was actually the first tax that the
government of America imposed on a domestic product. It angered the farmers
because in these regions, whiskey was also used as a medium of exchange of
goods. It was formed by the federal government and eventually became a law in
1791. The goal was to generate revenue to help reduce national debt and was
applied to all distilled spirits. Whiskey back then was the most famous
distilled beverage in the US and the excise tax that was added to it was known
to have greatly contributed to funding the war debt during the American
Revolutionary War. </span>
Answer:
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek
Explanation:
I've learned this in apwh, he is the father of Microbiology
<span>One of the qualities that new techniques in understanding brain sensory outcomes can be viewed in the analysis of observations in regards to what the test subject is experiencing, which is similar to how their brain may react to a given stressor or trigger.</span>
Answer: Stress and coping.
Explanation:
The stress and coping paradigm suggest that stress is a distinct relationship between someone and the context that is evaluated by that individual as too demanding and possibly dangerous to their well-being. This model requires not only the consideration of stressors, as environmental demands but also the judgments and coping resources the person has to deal with those demands.
