It is a false statement that every man and woman communicates in exactly the same way.
<h3>What makes the difference in the communication?</h3>
Men tends to communicate because they share information and accomplish a task while women do so to build relationships and develop understandings.
Therefore, the statement is a false statement.
Read more about communication
<em>brainly.com/question/26152499</em>
#SPJ4
The way in which state governments restricted the vote of African Americans after the American Revolution was through the imposition of discriminatory clauses such as poll taxes, by means of which it was impossible to grant people with fewer resources; literacy tests, by means of which only people with a certain level of education (who were generally only white) could vote; and the demands that the ancestors of the voter be free, which meant that the vast majority of African Americans could not meet this requirement.
These requirements were clearly unjust, discriminatory and unconstitutional, since they violated the freedoms of these people and their right to equality, which in turn are part of the very essence of the United States as a nation.
Learn more in brainly.com/question/8192893
Answer:
push: political and religious persecution
pull: open immigration policies
push: overpopulation
pull: moneymaking opportunities
push: lack of economic opportunities
pull: the "American Dream"
Explanation:
The largest sector of Israel's economy involves "<span>high-tech industries," since the relatively small size of Israel limits its production of other things such as petroleum and coffee. </span>
Answer:
It is not true that historians have the freedom to omit parts of evidence that they do not agree with.
Explanation:
Historians are academic professionals whose job is to collect events that occurred in the past, interpret them, and explain their development and consequences, including making connections between those events in the past and events in the present.
For this reason, historians cannot suppress content or events with which they do not agree, because if they did, they would be modifying the course of events and, therefore, reproducing an account of the events that would not coincide with reality.
