Answer: The correct answer is B; Manageable of Span Control.
Explanation:
The ideal ratio is just 1:5, however this is just the ideal ratio and not a requirement. This is the amount of people that should be under a supervisor during an incident. FEMA has these ideal ratios so when there is an emergency, everything can be controlled without being chaotic and is organized. This helps the manager be effective in managing his/her subordinates.
The other departments within NIMS management are the Modular organization, Management by Objectives, Chain of Command, and Unity of Command.
Answer:
The reason why the Founding Fathers created a six-year term limit for members of the Senate was:
B. So they could concentrate on the business of the government rather than reelection.
Explanation:
The idea behind the six-year term is stability, as was reasoned by James Madison. Senators could concentrate on doing their jobs instead of worrying about reelection very often. That would give them the chance to do a more stable job. Of course, to prevent Senators from losing touch with people and from becoming a way-too-powerful aristocracy, one-third of the Senators' terms would expire every two years, leaving two-thirds of the members in office.
<span> It refers to five Native American nations—the </span>Cherokee<span>, Chickasaw, </span>Choctaw<span>, Creek (Muscogee), and </span>Seminole<span>.</span>
Answer:
Luisa finds and corrects an error in ___punctuation_______.
Explanation:
a) The paragraph omitted a comma punctuation mark after the word "campfire." When Luisa puts this comma after "campfire," the sentence becomes grammatically correct.
So the error that Luisa finds and corrects in the passage is the omission of comma punctuation. A comma punctuation mark gives a short break in a sentence. Full stop gives a long break.
Answer: The correct answer is : Attacking the Motive
Explanation: The fallacy of attacking the motive happens when a person argues that the position of another person is invalid. In other words, the second argumentator attacks the first arguer's thesis and does so in a defiant way in his motives behind his argument, such as what benefits from his proposed thesis.
