Answer: Inference: A conclusion reached on the basis of evidence and reasoning.
Explanation:
I would say that a hoax deal in deception, whereas a prank deals in a practical joke sort of manner.
Answer:
The author couldn't follow his dreams because of the job market failure. He was an English major and wanted to be a writer but couldn't get the job. He tried for several months to get a job with no luck until he heard about an opening in a newspaper business. Nobody wanted the job so he took it. He didn't believe he could be a reporter because he never thought about it before. He wanted to write, not ask questions.
The failure of the job market shaped a motivator externally in the short story. If the job market was thriving, he would have probably found a writing job somewhere else instead of the reporter job he took. He would have never found his true passion for reporting with the failure.
Notice the Irony?
Answer:
The Earth is a big family; all the creatures are related to each other. Although other creatures beside human beings do not have sophisticated language ability, they have similar emotion sense like us. I love animals, and I was a volunteer at an animal shelter in Taiwan. One of my cats was from there. I remembered when I met her the first time she looked skinny and weak. She was terrified of people, and her eyes revealed sad emotion. After a period of time under my careful care, she gradually became different. She is full of vitality now. She started to believe that human beings and she still lives with us now.
Thus, I believe if we treat animals with kindness, they can feel it. I regard a cat's key ring as my spiritual symbol; it means I will protect them all my life. When I see news that is related to animal abuse, I feel particularly sad, especially when it is about animal testing. According to the survey, there is an estimation of 26 million animals suffered every year in the United States because of scientific and commercial testing. Those animals are usually born in a laboratory. They are born for the purpose of drug testing, and they do not have the right to choose. I think all animals have their rights to live in a healthy body. Therefore, if animal testing is prohibited, animals will get their liberation and freedom.
Animals have their rights. According to Tom Regan, “To be for animals is not to be against humanity. To require others to treat animals justly, as their rights required, is not to ask for anything more nor less in their case than in the case of any human to whom just treatment is due”. In this world, there are laws and regulations to prohibit human beings using other human beings to do experiment. However, there are no laws and regulations to protect animals from animal testing. Do animals have no right to live? Just because animals do not have the responsibility and obligation as do mankind, does it mean their lives are cheap and insignificant? If all kinds of tortures in experiments where was do on a child, will human beings still agree?
Explanation: brainliest please
